Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426139›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

Treatment strategies for ischiofemoral impingement: a systematic review.

Naoki Nakano, Haitham Shoman, Vikas Khanduja

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic Osteochondroma Resection for Treatment of Ischiofemoral Impingement Through Posterior Approach: A Case Report.Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ischiofemoral impingement syndrome: a case report and review of literature.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pain relief and good functional outcomes after hip endoscopy via posterior approach in patients with ischiofemoral impingement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naoki NakanoDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery - Young Adult Hip Service, Addenbrooke's-Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 37, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4067-9233
Haitham ShomanDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery - Young Adult Hip Service, Addenbrooke's-Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 37, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-7020
Vikas KhandujaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery - Young Adult Hip Service, Addenbrooke's-Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 37, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. vk279@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-3978
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere has been relatively little information about the treatment for ischiofemoral impingement (IFI) because of its rarity as well as the uncertainty of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to provide the reader with the available treatment strategies and their related outcomes for IFI based on the best available evidence, whilst highlighting classically accepted ways of treatment as well as relatively new surgical and non-surgical techniques.

methodsA systematic review of the literature from Medline, Embase, AMED, Cochrane and Google Scholar was undertaken since inception to December 2017 following the PRISMA guidelines. Clinical outcome studies, prospective/retrospective case series and case reports that described the treatment outcome for IFI were included. Animal or cadaveric studies, trial protocols, diagnostic studies without any description of treatments, technical notes without any results, and review articles were excluded.

resultsThis systematic review found 17 relevant papers. No comparative studies were included in the final records for qualitative assessment, which means all the studies were case series and case reports. Eight studies (47.1%) utilised non-surgical treatment including injection and prolotherapy, followed by endoscopic surgery (5 studies, 29.4%) then open surgery (4 studies, 23.5%). Mean age of the participants was 41 years (11-72 years). The mean follow-up was 8.4 months distributed from 2 weeks to 2.3 years. No complications or adverse effects were found from the systematic review.

conclusionSeveral treatment strategies have been reported for IFI, and most of them have good short- to medium-term outcomes with a low rate of complications. However, there are no comparative studies to assess the superiority of one technique over another, thus further research with randomised controlled trials is required in this arena. This study explores the wide variety and categories of different treatments used for IFI to guide physicians and shed light on what can be done for this challenging cohort of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyHip JointHumansJoint DiseasesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopyExtra-articular impingementHipIschiofemoral impingementQuadratus femorisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30426139
PMCPMC7471170
OpenAlexW2901125074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.