Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426013›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2018

Assessment of Pain Management, Acceptance of Illness, and Adjustment to Life with Cancer in Patients with Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Wojciech Krajewski, Małgorzata Mazur, Adrian Poterek, Agata Pastuszak, Urszula Halska, Andrzej Tukiendorf, Joanna Rymaszewska, Romuald Zdrojowy

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Acceptance in Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: What Matters to Patients?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Sociodemographic factors affecting the disease acceptance in the group of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Borowska 213 50-556, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1727-2283
Małgorzata MazurDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Borowska 213 50-556, Wrocław, Poland.
Adrian PoterekDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Borowska 213 50-556, Wrocław, Poland.
Agata PastuszakDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Borowska 213 50-556, Wrocław, Poland.
Urszula HalskaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Opole Medical School, Katowicka 68, 45-060 Opole, Poland.
Andrzej TukiendorfDepartment of Social Medicine, Wrocław Medical University, Pasteura 10, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Joanna RymaszewskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Pasteura 10, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8985-3592
Romuald ZdrojowyDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Borowska 213 50-556, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccording to the European Association of Urology bladder cancer is the seventh most commonly diagnosed malignancy in the world's male population. Despite its high incidence, papers evaluating psychological state in those patients' group are lacking. The purpose of the study was to evaluate pain management, disease acceptance, and adjustment to cancer in homogenous group of patients diagnosed with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

methodsGroup of 252 male patients who were scheduled for NMIBC treatment were prospectively evaluated. Patients fulfilled Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS), Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) and Coping Strategies (CSQ) questionnaires before treatment introduction.

resultsHighest CSQ score was achieved by the coping self-statements subscale (mean=18,37). The catastrophizing subscale score was the lowest (mean=11,24). Place of residence affected results of CSQ statement about pain control. Catastrophizing and coping self-statements strategies were associated with matrimonial status. In the Mini-MAC questionnaire the fighting spirit way of coping had the highest (21,73) and the helplessness-hopelessness subscale had the lowest mean value (13,3). Matrimonial status was strongly associated with anxious preoccupation, fighting spirit, and helplessness - hopelessness way of coping. The mean AIS test score was 28.8. AIS result was influenced by patient's marital status, yet not by education, place of residence, nor any clinical factor.

conclusionsIn the examined group, the level of acceptance of the disease reached values that were slightly higher than the average. It indicated a fairly good adaptation to cancer. Among the methods of coping with cancer, the constructive style is definitely dominant with a high intensity of the fighting spirit strategy. The destructive style of cancer coping reached low values with a low intensity of helplessness/hopelessness strategy. From pain coping strategies, self-statements and praying/hoping were the most commonly chosen ways, whereas catastrophizing was the rarest. Many associations between various questioners' results were also observed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMental HealingMiddle AgedPain ManagementUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30426013
PMCPMC6217895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.