ArticlePeerJ2018
Early identification of recurrence in ovarian cancer: a comparison between the ovarian cancer metastasis index and CA-125 levels.
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of CA-125 in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Pooled it
- Knockdown of MUC16 (CA125) Enhances the Migration and Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- The Prevalence and associated Factors for Liver Metastases, Development and Prognosis in newly diagnosed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A large Population-Based Study from the SEER Database.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy. A clinical observational study was performed to investigate whether indicators that assess the risk of metastasis can identify recurrence earlier in OC patients. By successfully recruiting 41 patients with OC who underwent chemotherapy, we compared cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and the ovarian cancer metastasis index (OCMI), which was previously developed by us in the clinic for this purpose. Our results showed that patients and their families generally took a sensible attitude toward disease progression and were willing to accept a new way to gain knowledge about the disease. Herein, the new way was the possibility of monitoring recurrence by introducing the OCMI into the clinic. Fifteen patients experienced recurrence during chemotherapy, implying treatment failure. For 53% of these patients, an abnormally high OCMI suggested a strong tendency toward metastasis at least one chemotherapy cycle prior to the pathological examination confirming recurrence. In comparison, the early recognition rate of recurrence using CA-125 levels was merely 13%. Furthermore, we found that the mean values of the OCMI no longer declined after the fourth chemotherapy cycle, implying that excessive chemotherapy brings no benefit to OC patients. In conclusion, our findings provide a novel and feasible approach to monitor the effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of OC by assessing the potential risk of metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.