Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

LORETA With Cortical Constraint: Choosing an Adequate Surface Laplacian Operator.

Todor Iordanov, Harald Bornfleth, Carsten H Wolters, Vesela Pasheva, Georgi Venkov, Benjamin Lanfer, Michael Scherg, Tobias Scherg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Todor IordanovBESA GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.
Harald BornflethBESA GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.
Carsten H WoltersInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Vesela PashevaFaculty of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Georgi VenkovFaculty of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Benjamin LanferBESA GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.
Michael SchergBESA GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.
Tobias SchergBESA GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) is a well-known method for the solution of the l2-based minimization problem for EEG/MEG source reconstruction. LORETA with a volume-based source space is widely used and much effort has been invested in the theory and the application of the method in an experimental context. However, it is especially interesting to use anatomical prior knowledge and constrain the LORETA's solution to the cortical surface. This strongly reduces the number of unknowns in the inverse approach. Unlike the Laplace operator in the volume case with a rectangular and regular grid, the mesh is triangulated and highly irregular in the surface case. Thus, it is not trivial to choose or construct a Laplace operator (termed Laplace-Beltrami operator when applied to surfaces) that has the desired properties and takes into account the geometry of the mesh. In this paper, the basic methodology behind cortical LORETA is discussed and the method is applied for source reconstruction of simulated data using different Laplace-Beltrami operators in the smoothing term. The results achieved with the different operators are compared with respect to their accuracy using various measures. Conclusions about the choice of an appropriate operator are deduced from the results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain imagingBrain Mappingcortical imagingElectroencephalographyMagnetoencephalopgraphysurface Laplacian

Identifiers

PMID30425613
PMCPMC6218614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.