Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425606›Full record

ReviewReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Nanoparticles applied to cancer immunoregulation.

Fernando Lopez-Campos, Danielle Candini, Eliseo Carrasco, Miguel Angel Berenguer Francés

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Natural carrier systems in cancer vaccines and immunotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Peptide-based vaccine for cancer therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): A review.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Current role of nanoparticles in the treatment of lung cancer.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernando Lopez-CamposRadiation Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Danielle CandiniRadiation Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Eliseo CarrascoRadiation Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Angel Berenguer FrancésRadiation Oncology Department, Catalan Oncology Institute, IDIBELL, Hospitalet-Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn recent years, we have seen a considerable increase in the relevance of nanostructures for the safe delivery of therapeutic agents and their capacity as an immunomodulatory tool. MATERIALS AND

methodsPotential clinical applications related to their unique structural properties have been described in the evolving landscape of immunotherapy.

resultsThis review briefly summarizes the evidence for the role of nanoparticles in regulating the immune response.

conclusionsTheir main features to highlight how to provide an innovative means of biomedical application to oncology research.

Indexed as

Carbon nanocarriersDendrimersGold nanoparticlesHomingLiposomesNanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID30425606
PMCPMC6223232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.