Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425564›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2018

Functional magnetic resonance imaging: cerebral function alterations in subthreshold and suprathreshold spinal cord stimulation.

Sander De Groote, Mats De Jaeger, Peter Van Schuerbeek, Stefan Sunaert, Ronald Peeters, Dirk Loeckx, Lisa Goudman, Patrice Forget, Ann De Smedt, Maarten Moens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sander De GrooteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, mtmoens@gmail.com.
Mats De JaegerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, mtmoens@gmail.com.
Peter Van SchuerbeekDepartment of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, mtmoens@gmail.com.
Stefan SunaertDepartment of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ronald PeetersDepartment of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk LoeckxCOMETRIX, Leuven, Belgium.
Lisa GoudmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, mtmoens@gmail.com.
Patrice ForgetDepartment Anesthesiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ann De SmedtDepartment of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Maarten MoensDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, mtmoens@gmail.com.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFailed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a common and devastating chronic neuropathic pain disorder. Conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applies electrical suprathreshold pulses to the spinal cord at a frequency of 40-60 Hz and relieves pain in FBSS patients. During the last decade, two major changes have emerged in the techniques of stimulating the spinal cord: paresthesia-free or subthreshold stimulation and administration of higher frequency or higher amounts of energy to the spinal cord. Despite the positive clinical results, the mechanism of action remains unclear. A functional MRI (fMRI) study was conducted to investigate the brain alterations during subthreshold and suprathreshold stimulation at different frequencies.

methodsTen subjects with FBSS, treated with externalized SCS, received randomly four different stimulation frequencies (4 Hz, 60 Hz, 500 Hz, and 1 kHz) during four consecutive days. At every frequency, the patient underwent sub- and suprathreshold stimulation. Cerebral activity was monitored and assessed using fMRI.

resultsSuprathreshold stimulation is generally accompanied with more activity than sub-threshold SCS. Suprathreshold SCS resulted in increased bilateral activation of the frontal cortex, thalamus, pre- and postcentral gyri, basal ganglia, cingulate gyrus, insula, thalamus, and claustrum. We observed deactivation of the bilateral parahippocampus, amygdala, precuneus, posterior cingulate gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and unilateral superior temporal gyrus.

conclusionSuprathreshold stimulation resulted in greater activity (both activation and deactivation) of the frontal brain regions; the sensory, limbic, and motor cortices; and the diencephalon in comparison with subthreshold stimulation. Each type of frequency at suprathreshold stimulation was characterized by an individual activation pattern.

Indexed as

fMRIfrequencyspinal cord stimulationsubthresholdsuprathreshold

Identifiers

PMID30425564
PMCPMC6205143
OpenAlexW2896434876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.