Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425484›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Liposomal nanoparticle-based conserved peptide influenza vaccine and monosodium urate crystal adjuvant elicit protective immune response in pigs.

Santosh Dhakal, Xingguo Cheng, John Salcido, Sankar Renu, Kathy Bondra, Yashavantha Shaan Lakshmanappa, Christina Misch, Shristi Ghimire, Ninoshkaly Feliciano-Ruiz, Bradley Hogshead and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Santosh DhakalFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Xingguo ChengPharmaceuticals and Bioengineering Department, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238-0510, USA, xcheng@swri.org.
John SalcidoPharmaceuticals and Bioengineering Department, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238-0510, USA, xcheng@swri.org.
Sankar RenuFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Kathy BondraFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Yashavantha Shaan LakshmanappaFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Christina MischFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Shristi GhimireFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Ninoshkaly Feliciano-RuizFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Bradley HogsheadFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Steven KrakowkaThe Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kenneth CarsonPharmaceuticals and Bioengineering Department, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238-0510, USA, xcheng@swri.org.
Joseph McDonoughPharmaceuticals and Bioengineering Department, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238-0510, USA, xcheng@swri.org.
Chang Won LeeFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Gourapura J RenukaradhyaFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA, gourapura.1@osu.edu.
Ohio Department of Health · USSouthwest Research Institute · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza (flu) is a constant threat to humans and animals, and vaccination is one of the most effective ways to mitigate the disease. Due to incomplete protection induced by current flu vaccines, development of novel flu vaccine candidates is warranted to achieve greater efficacy against constantly evolving flu viruses.

methodsIn the present study, we used liposome nanoparticle (<200 nm diameter)-based subunit flu vaccine containing ten encapsulated highly conserved B and T cell epitope peptides to induce protective immune response against a zoonotic swine influenza A virus (SwIAV) H1N1 challenge infection in a pig model. Furthermore, we used monosodium urate (MSU) crystals as an adjuvant and co-administered the vaccine formulation as an intranasal mist to flu-free nursery pigs, twice at 3-week intervals.

resultsLiposome peptides flu vaccine delivered with MSU adjuvant improved the hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer and mucosal IgA response against the SwIAV challenge and also against two other highly genetically variant IAVs. Liposomal vaccines also enhanced the frequency of peptides and virus-specific T-helper/memory cells and IFN-γ response. The improved specific cellular and mucosal humoral immune responses in adjuvanted liposomal peptides flu vaccine partially protected pigs from flu-induced fever and pneumonic lesions, and reduced the nasal virus shedding and viral load in the lungs.

conclusionOverall, our study shows great promise for using liposome and MSU adjuvant- based subunit flu vaccine through the intranasal route, and provides scope for future, pre-clinical investigations in a pig model for developing potent human intranasal subunit flu vaccines.

Indexed as

ImmunityAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibody FormationBody TemperatureCytokinesDogsImmunity, MucosalImmunologic MemoryInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesLiposomesLungMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsAdjuvants, ImmunologicCytokinesInfluenza VaccinesLiposomesPeptidesUric Acidinfluenza A virus peptidesintranasal vaccinationliposome nanoparticlesmonosodium urate crystal adjuvantpigsswine influenza virus

Identifiers

PMID30425484
PMCPMC6205527
OpenAlexW2896868867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.