Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425349›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

A phase Ib dose-escalation and expansion study of the oral MEK inhibitor pimasertib and PI3K/MTOR inhibitor voxtalisib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Alison M Schram, Leena Gandhi, Monica M Mita, Lars Damstrup, Frank Campana, Manuel Hidalgo, Enrique Grande, David M Hyman, Rebecca S Heist

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Combined inhibition of KRASNature communications · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alison M SchramMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. schrama@mskcc.org.
Leena GandhiNew York University Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Monica M MitaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lars DamstrupMerck Serono, Darmstadt, Germany.
Frank CampanaSanofi-Aventis, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Manuel HidalgoBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Enrique GrandeHospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
David M HymanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca S HeistMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Training Program (ICTTP)T32CA009207 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Omar Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Drilon · 1985 to 2026
$13.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase Ib study evaluated the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of pimasertib (MSC1936369B), a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in combination with voxtalisib (SAR245409), a pan-PI3K and mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

methodsThis study included a dose escalation and expansion in patients with select tumour types and alterations in the MAPK or PI3K pathways. A 3 + 3 design was used to determine MTD. Patients were evaluated for adverse events and tumour response.

results146 patients were treated, including 63 in dose escalation and 83 in expansion. The MTD was pimasertib 90 mg and voxtalisib 70 mg daily. Based on the safety profile, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was pimasertib 60 mg and voxtalisib 70 mg. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhoea (75%), fatigue (57%), and nausea (50%). Responses included a complete response in one patient (1%), partial response in five (5%), and stable disease in 51 (46%). At the RP2D, 74 patients required dose interruption (73%), 20 required dose reduction (20%), and 26 discontinued treatment due to TEAEs (26%).

conclusionsThe combination of pimasertib and voxtalisib showed poor long-term tolerability and limited anti-tumour activity in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesNeoplasmsNiacinamideQuinoxalinesSulfonamidesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesN-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-1-((2-fluoro-4-iodophenyl)amino)isonicotinamideNiacinamidePhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsQuinoxalinesSulfonamidesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesXL765

Identifiers

PMID30425349
PMCPMC6288157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.