Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425287›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

High Oxygen Exchange to Music Indicates Auditory Distractibility in Acquired Brain Injury: An fNIRS Study with a Vector-Based Phase Analysis.

Eunju Jeong, Hokyoung Ryu, Joon-Ho Shin, Gyu Hyun Kwon, Geonsang Jo, Ji-Yeong Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07702513 (A Pilot Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Study of Home-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation to Evaluate Mobility, Balance, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07702513 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Study of Home-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation to Evaluate Mobility, Balance, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorCraig HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled33ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Patient, TBIArmsHome-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Scoping Review on the Use of Music for Emotion Regulation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eunju JeongDepartment of Arts and Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea. ejeong@hanyang.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-5419
Hokyoung RyuDepartment of Arts and Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Joon-Ho ShinDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, 01022, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6447-8829
Gyu Hyun KwonDepartment of Arts and Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Geonsang JoDepartment of Arts and Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Yeong LeeDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, 01022, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2018R1C1B5044305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention deficits due to auditory distractibility are pervasive among patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). It remains unclear, however, whether attention deficits following ABI specific to auditory modality are associated with altered haemodynamic responses. Here, we examined cerebral haemodynamic changes using functional near-infrared spectroscopy combined with a topological vector-based analysis method. A total of thirty-seven participants (22 healthy adults, 15 patients with ABI) performed a melodic contour identification task (CIT) that simulates auditory distractibility. Findings demonstrated that the melodic CIT was able to detect auditory distractibility in patients with ABI. The rate-corrected score showed that the ABI group performed significantly worse than the non-ABI group in both CIT1 (target contour identification against environmental sounds) and CIT2 (target contour identification against target-like distraction). Phase-associated response intensity during the CITs was greater in the ABI group than in the non-ABI group. Moreover, there existed a significant interaction effect in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during CIT1 and CIT2. These findings indicated that stronger hemodynamic responses involving oxygen exchange in the left DLPFC can serve as a biomarker for evaluating and monitoring auditory distractibility, which could potentially lead to the discovery of the underlying mechanism that causes auditory attention deficits in patients with ABI.

Indexed as

AttentionMusicSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrain InjuriesCase-Control StudiesData AnalysisFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenReaction TimeOxygen

Identifiers

PMID30425287
PMCPMC6233191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.