Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425194›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2018

Beneficial Effect of Moderately Increasing Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Pressure on Donor after Cardiac Death Renal Transplantation.

Chen-Guang Ding, Pu-Xun Tian, Xiao-Ming Ding, He-Li Xiang, Yang Li, Xiao-Hui Tian, Feng Han, Qian-Hui Tai, Qian-Long Liu, Jin Zheng and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical outcomes prediction in kidney transplantation by use of biomarkers from hypothermic machine perfusion.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen-Guang DingDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Pu-Xun TianDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Xiao-Ming DingDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
He-Li XiangDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Yang LiDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Xiao-Hui TianDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Feng HanDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Qian-Hui TaiDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Qian-Long LiuDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Jin ZhengDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Wu-Jun XueDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Nephropathy Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular resistance and flow rate during hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of kidneys is correlated with graft function. We aimed to determine the effects of increasing HMP pressure versus maintaining the initial pressure on kidney transplantation outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 76 primary transplantation patients who received HMP-preserved kidneys from 48 donors after cardiac death between September 1, 2013, and August 31, 2015. HMP pressure was increased from 30 to 40 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) in kidneys with poor flow and/or vascular resistance (increased pressure [IP] group; 36 patients); otherwise, the initial pressure was maintained (constant pressure group; 40 patients). Finally, the clinical characteristics and transplantation outcomes in both groups were assessed.

resultsDelayed graft function (DGF) incidence, 1-year allograft, patient survival, kidney function recovery time, and serum creatinine level on day 30 were similar in both groups, with improved flow and resistance in the IP group. Among patients with DGF, kidney function recovery time and DGF duration were ameliorated in the IP group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that donor hypertension (odds ratio [OR]: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-2.06, P = 0.035), donor terminal serum creatinine (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06-1.62, P = 0.023), warm ischemic time (OR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.97-6.37, P = 0.002), and terminal resistance (OR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.76-6.09, P = 0.012) were independent predictors of DGF. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that terminal resistance (hazard ratio: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.32-5.16, P = 0.032) significantly affected graft survival.

conclusionIncreased HMP pressure improves graft perfusion but does not affect DGF incidence or 1-year graft survival.

Indexed as

AdultAllograftsDelayed Graft FunctionFemaleHumansHypertensionKidney Function TestsKidney TransplantationLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOrgan PreservationRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsDelayed Graft FunctionDonor after Cardiac DeathHypothermic Machine PerfusionKidney Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID30425194
PMCPMC6247599
OpenAlexW2901872663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.