Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425178›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Tagging the musical beat: Neural entrainment or event-related potentials?

Giacomo Novembre, Gian Domenico Iannetti

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endogenous sources of interbrain synchrony in duetting pianists.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rhythmic Modulation of Visual Perception by Continuous Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An oscillator model better predicts cortical entrainment to music.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Frequency tagging cannot measure neural tracking of beat or meter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Reply to Novembre and Iannetti: Conceptual and methodological issues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giacomo NovembreDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; g.iannetti@ucl.ac.uk g.novembre@ucl.ac.uk.
Gian Domenico IannettiDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; g.iannetti@ucl.ac.uk g.novembre@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsMusicAuditory Perception

Identifiers

PMID30425178
PMCPMC6255208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.