Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30425115›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2019

Network meta-analysis explained.

Sofia Dias, Deborah M Caldwell

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 38 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 38 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 38 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sofia DiasCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-0221
Deborah M CaldwellBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/M005232/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicClinical Decision-MakingComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansModels, StatisticalTreatment Outcomeevidence based medicinemeta-analysisstatistics

Identifiers

PMID30425115
PMCPMC6761999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.