Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424788›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

ResistanceSim: development and acceptability study of a serious game to improve understanding of insecticide resistance management in vector control programmes.

Edward K Thomsen, Charlotte Hemingway, Andy South, Kirsten A Duda, Claire Dormann, Robert Farmer, Michael Coleman, Marlize Coleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward K ThomsenLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Charlotte HemingwayLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Andy SouthLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Kirsten A DudaLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Claire DormannLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Robert FarmerExtra Mile Studios, 142 West Nile St, Glasgow, G1 2RQ, UK.
Michael ColemanLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. michael.coleman@lstmed.ac.uk.
Marlize ColemanLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of insecticides is the cornerstone of effective malaria vector control. However, the last two decades has seen the ubiquitous use of insecticides, predominantly pyrethroids, causing widespread insecticide resistance and compromising the effectiveness of vector control. Considerable efforts to develop new active ingredients and interventions are underway. However, it is essential to deploy strategies to mitigate the impact of insecticide resistance now, both to maintain the efficacy of currently available tools as well as to ensure the sustainability of new tools as they come to market. Although the World Health Organization disseminated best practice guidelines for insecticide resistance management (IRM), Rollback Malaria's Vector Control Working Group identified the lack of practical knowledge of IRM as the primary gap in the translation of evidence into policy. ResistanceSim is a capacity strengthening tool designed to address this gap. The development process involved frequent stakeholder consultation, including two separate workshops. These workshops defined the learning objectives, target audience, and the role of mathematical models in the game. Software development phases were interspersed with frequent user testing, resulting in an iterative design process. User feedback was evaluated via questionnaires with Likert-scale and open-ended questions. The game was regularly evaluated by subject-area experts through meetings of an external advisory panel. Through these processes, a series of learning domains were identified and a set of specific learning objectives for each domain were defined to be communicated to vector control programme personnel. A simple "game model" was proposed that produces realistic outputs based on player strategy and also runs in real-time. Early testing sessions revealed numerous usability issues that prevented adequate player engagement. After extensive revisions, later testing sessions indicated that the tool would be a valuable addition to IRM training.

Indexed as

Games, ExperimentalInsecticide ResistanceAnimalsAnophelesGame TheoryHumansInsecticidesMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsInsecticidesCapacity buildingInsecticide resistanceInsecticide resistance managementSerious gamesTrainingVector control

Identifiers

PMID30424788
PMCPMC6234623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.