Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424769›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

A decision support system to follow up and diagnose primary headache patients using semantically enriched data.

Gilles Vandewiele, Femke De Backere, Kiani Lannoye, Maarten Vanden Berghe, Olivier Janssens, Sofie Van Hoecke, Vincent Keereman, Koen Paemeleire, Femke Ongenae, Filip De Turck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Computerized migraine diagnostic tools: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Machine learning approach to predict medication overuse in migraine patients.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gilles VandewieleIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium. gilles.vandewiele@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9531-0623
Femke De BackereIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Kiani LannoyeIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Maarten Vanden BergheIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Olivier JanssensIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Sofie Van HoeckeIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Vincent KeeremanDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Koen PaemeleireDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Femke OngenaeIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Filip De TurckIDLab, Ghent University - imec, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache disorders are an important health burden, having a large health-economic impact worldwide. Current treatment & follow-up processes are often archaic, creating opportunities for computer-aided and decision support systems to increase their efficiency. Existing systems are mostly completely data-driven, and the underlying models are a black-box, deteriorating interpretability and transparency, which are key factors in order to be deployed in a clinical setting.

methodsIn this paper, a decision support system is proposed, composed of three components: (i) a cross-platform mobile application to capture the required data from patients to formulate a diagnosis, (ii) an automated diagnosis support module that generates an interpretable decision tree, based on data semantically annotated with expert knowledge, in order to support physicians in formulating the correct diagnosis and (iii) a web application such that the physician can efficiently interpret captured data and learned insights by means of visualizations.

resultsWe show that decision tree induction techniques achieve competitive accuracy rates, compared to other black- and white-box techniques, on a publicly available dataset, referred to as migbase. Migbase contains aggregated information of headache attacks from 849 patients. Each sample is labeled with one of three possible primary headache disorders. We demonstrate that we are able to reduce the classification error, statistically significant (ρ≤0.05), with more than 10% by balancing the dataset using prior expert knowledge. Furthermore, we achieve high accuracy rates by using features extracted using the Weisfeiler-Lehman kernel, which is completely unsupervised. This makes it an ideal approach to solve a potential cold start problem.

conclusionDecision trees are the perfect candidate for the automated diagnosis support module. They achieve predictive performances competitive to other techniques on the migbase dataset and are, foremost, completely interpretable. Moreover, the incorporation of prior knowledge increases both predictive performance as well as transparency of the resulting predictive model on the studied dataset.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision TreesExpert SystemsFollow-Up StudiesHeadache DisordersHumansSoftwareDecision support systemMobile cross-platform developmentPrimary headache disordersPrior knowledge incorporationWeb application developmentWhite-box predictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID30424769
PMCPMC6234630
OpenAlexW2901135493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.