Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424726›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Whole genome sequencing of Trypanosoma cruzi field isolates reveals extensive genomic variability and complex aneuploidy patterns within TcII DTU.

João Luís Reis-Cunha, Rodrigo P Baptista, Gabriela F Rodrigues-Luiz, Anderson Coqueiro-Dos-Santos, Hugo O Valdivia, Laila Viana de Almeida, Mariana Santos Cardoso, Daniella Alchaar D'Ávila, Fernando Hugo Cunha Dias, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Research square · 2026
    Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ClinicalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Identification of highly conservedEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

João Luís Reis-CunhaDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rodrigo P BaptistaDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gabriela F Rodrigues-LuizDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Anderson Coqueiro-Dos-SantosDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Hugo O ValdiviaDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Laila Viana de AlmeidaDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Mariana Santos CardosoDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Daniella Alchaar D'ÁvilaDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fernando Hugo Cunha DiasDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ricardo Toshio FujiwaraDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lúcia M C GalvãoDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Egler ChiariDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gustavo Coutinho CerqueiraBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, USA.
Daniella C BartholomeuDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. daniella@icb.ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-7357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas disease, is currently divided into six discrete typing units (DTUs), named TcI-TcVI. TcII is among the major DTUs enrolled in human infections in South America southern cone, where it is associated with severe cardiac and digestive symptoms. Despite the importance of TcII in Chagas disease epidemiology and pathology, so far, no genome-wide comparisons of the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes of TcII field isolates have been performed to track the variability and evolution of this DTU in endemic regions.

resultsIn the present work, we have sequenced and compared the whole nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of seven TcII strains isolated from chagasic patients from the central and northeastern regions of Minas Gerais, Brazil, revealing an extensive genetic variability within this DTU. A comparison of the phylogeny based on the nuclear or mitochondrial genomes revealed that the majority of branches were shared by both sequences. The subtle divergences in the branches are probably consequence of mitochondrial introgression events between TcII strains. Two T. cruzi strains isolated from patients living in the central region of Minas Gerais, S15 and S162a, were clustered in the nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeny analysis. These two strains were isolated from the other five by the Espinhaço Mountains, a geographic barrier that could have restricted the traffic of insect vectors during T. cruzi evolution in the Minas Gerais state. Finally, the presence of aneuploidies was evaluated, revealing that all seven TcII strains have a different pattern of chromosomal duplication/loss.

conclusionsAnalysis of genomic variability and aneuploidies suggests that there is significant genomic variability within Minas Gerais TcII strains, which could be exploited by the parasite to allow rapid selection of favorable phenotypes. Also, the aneuploidy patterns vary among T. cruzi strains and does not correlate with the nuclear phylogeny, suggesting that chromosomal duplication/loss are recent and frequent events in the parasite evolution.

Indexed as

AneuploidyGenetic VariationGenome, ProtozoanAnimalsChagas DiseaseDNA, ProtozoanGenotypeHumansInsect VectorsMolecular TypingPhylogenyProtozoan ProteinsTrypanosoma cruziWhole Genome SequencingDNA, ProtozoanProtozoan ProteinsCopy number variationField isolatesGenomic variabilityPloidyTcIITrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID30424726
PMCPMC6234542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.