ArticleMicromachines2018
MagIO: Magnetic Field Strength Based Indoor- Outdoor Detection with a Commercial Smartphone.
Article in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Machine Learning Approach for Movement Monitoring in Clustered Workplaces to Control COVID-19 Based on Geofencing and Fusion of Wi-Fi and Magnetic Field Metrics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comprehension of polarity of articles by citation sentiment analysis using TF-IDF and ML classifiers.PeerJ. Computer science · 2022Article
- Deep Learning Based Early Detection Framework for Preliminary Diagnosis of COVID-19 via Onboard Smartphone Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Novel Approach to Railway Track Faults Detection Using Acoustic Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Review of Environmental Context Detection for Navigation Based on Multiple Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Machine learning-based operation skills assessment with vascular difficulty index for vascular intervention surgery.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Physiological and Behavior Monitoring Systems for Smart Healthcare Environments: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Indoor Positioning on Disparate Commercial Smartphones Using Wi-Fi Access Points Coverage Area.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Floor Identification Using Magnetic Field Data With Smartphone Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A Fast Indoor/Outdoor Transition Detection Algorithm Based on Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Mobile User Indoor-Outdoor Detection Through Physical Daily Activities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- BLocate: A Building Identification Scheme in GPS Denied Environments Using Smartphone Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A wide range of localization techniques has been proposed recently that leverage smartphone sensors. Context awareness serves as the backbone of these localization techniques, which helps them to shift the localization technologies to improve efficiency and energy utilization. Indoor-outdoor (IO) context sensing plays a vital role for such systems, which serve both indoor and outdoor localization. IO systems work with collaborative technologies including the Global Positioning System (GPS), cellular tower signals, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and a variety of smartphone sensors. GPS- and Wi-Fi-based systems are power hungry, and their accuracy is severed by limiting factors like multipath, shadowing, etc. On the other hand, various built-in smartphone sensors can be deployed for environmental sensing. Although these sensors can play a crucial role, yet they are very less studied. This research aims at investigating the use of ambient magnetic field data alone from a smartphone for IO detection. The research first investigates the feasibility of utilizing magnetic field data alone for IO detection and then extracts different features suitable for IO detection to be used in machine learning-based classifiers to discriminate between indoor and outdoor environments. The experiments are performed at three different places including a subway station, a shopping mall and Yeungnam University (YU), Korea. The training data are collected from one spot of the campus, and testing is performed with data from various locations of the above-mentioned places. The experiment involves Samsung Galaxy S8, LG G6 and Samsung Galaxy Round smartphones. The results show that the magnetic data from smartphone magnetic sensor embody enough information and can discriminate the indoor environment from the outdoor environment. Naive Bayes (NB) outperforms with a classification accuracy of 83.26%, as against Support vector machines (SVM), random induction (RI), gradient boosting machines (GBM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (kNN) and decision trees (DT), whose accuracies are 67.21%, 73.38%, 73.40%, 78.59%, 69.53% and 68.60%, respectively. kNN, SVM and DT do not perform well when noisy data are used for classification. Additionally, other dynamic scenarios affect the attitude of magnetic data and degrade the performance of SVM, RI and GBM. NB and RF prove to be more noise tolerant and environment adaptable and perform very well in dynamic scenarios. Keeping in view the performance of these classifiers, an ensemble-based stacking scheme is presented, which utilizes DT and RI as the base learners and naive Bayes as the ensemble classifier. This approach is able to achieve an accuracy of 85.30% using the magnetic data of the smartphone magnetic sensor. Moreover, with an increase in training data, the accuracy of the stacking scheme can be elevated by 0.83%. The performance of the proposed approach is compared with GPS-, Wi-Fi- and light sensor-based IO detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.