Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424416›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2018

Evaluation of Electrovibration Stimulation with a Narrow Electrode.

Hiroki Ishizuka, Seiya Komurasaki, Kunihiro Kato, Hiroyuki Kajimoto

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiroki IshizukaDepartment of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Engineering, Institute of Technology, Kagawa University, 2217-20 Hayashi-cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan. hi1124@eng.kagawa-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9920-6903
Seiya KomurasakiDepartment of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Engineering, Institute of Technology, Kagawa University, 2217-20 Hayashi-cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan. s15t421@stu.kagawa-u.ac.jp.
Kunihiro KatoDepartment of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan. kkunihir@acm.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0117-8981
Hiroyuki KajimotoDepartment of Informatics, University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan. kajimoto@kaji-lab.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, electrovibration tactile displays were studied and applied to several use cases by researchers. The high-resolution electrode for electrovibration stimulus will contribute to the presentation of a more realistic tactile sensation. However, the sizes of the electrodes that have been used thus far are of the millimeter-order. In this study, we evaluated whether a single narrow electrode was able to provide the electrovibration stimulus adequately. The widths of the prepared electrodes were 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μm. We conducted a sensory experiment to characterize each electrode. The electrodes with widths of 50 μm or less were not durable or suitable for the applied signal, although the subjects perceived the stimulus. Therefore, we conducted the experiment without using these non-durable electrodes. The voltage waveform condition affected perception, and the subjects were not sensitive to the electrovibration stimulus at low frequencies. In addition, the stroke direction of the fingertip had a significant effect on perception under certain conditions. The results indicate that electrovibration stimulation requires an electrode with a width of only a few hundred micrometers for stimulation.

Indexed as

electrovibrationMEMSmicro-actuatortactile display

Identifiers

PMID30424416
PMCPMC6215128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.