Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424260›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2018

Engineering of Removing Sacrificial Materials in 3D-Printed Microfluidics.

Pengju Yin, Bo Hu, Langlang Yi, Chun Xiao, Xu Cao, Lei Zhao, Hongyan Shi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04239105 (Detection and Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04239105 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Detection and Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Patients With Breast Cancer Using a Novel Microfluidic and Raman Spectrum Device

TypeobservationalSponsorXijing HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Circulating Tumor CellsArmsMicrofluidic and Raman spectrum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pengju YinSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. pjyin@stu.xidian.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-2887
Bo HuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. bohu@xidian.edu.cn.
Langlang YiSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. llyi@stu.xidian.edu.cn.
Chun XiaoSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. 1995xiaochun@gmail.com.
Xu CaoSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. Xu.Cao@Dartmouth.edu.
Lei ZhaoSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. zhaolei@xidian.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1440-1027
Hongyan ShiSchool of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China. hyshi@xidian.edu.cn.
Xidian University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities JB161208, JB171208, and XJS15054National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC0102000 and 2017YFA0205202National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772011Social Development of Key Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi Province 2016SF-235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing will create a revolution in the field of microfluidics due to fabricating truly three-dimensional channels in a single step. During the 3D-printing process, sacrificial materials are usually needed to fulfill channels inside and support the printed chip outside. Removing sacrificial materials after printing is obviously crucial for applying these 3D printed chips to microfluidics. However, there are few standard methods to address this issue. In this paper, engineering techniques of removing outer and inner sacrificial materials were studied. Meanwhile, quantification methods of removal efficiency for outer and inner sacrificial materials were proposed, respectively. For outer sacrificial materials, a hot bath in vegetable oil can remove 89.9% ± 0.1% of sacrificial materials, which is better than mechanics removal, hot oven heating, and an ethanol bath. For inner sacrificial materials, injecting 70 °C vegetable oil for 720 min is an optimized approach because of the uniformly high transmittance (93.8% ± 6.8%) and no obvious deformation. For the industrialization of microfluidics, the cost-effective removing time is around 10 min, which considers the balance between time cost and chip transmittance. The optimized approach and quantification methods presented in this paper show general engineering sacrificial materials removal techniques, which promote removing sacrificial materials from 3D-printed microfluidics chips and take 3D printing a step further in microfluidic applications.

Indexed as

3D printingmicrofluidicsquantificationremoving efficiencysacrificial materials

Identifiers

PMID30424260
PMCPMC6082279
OpenAlexW2810639143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.