Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424178›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2018

Manipulation of Biological Cells Using a Robot-Aided Optical Tweezers System.

Mingyang Xie, Adnan Shakoor, Changcheng Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advanced tools and methods for single-cell surgery.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2022
    Review
  8. Non-Invasive Dynamic Reperfusion of MicrovesselsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Trapping and Manipulation of Single Cells in Crowded Environments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingyang XieCollege of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China. myxie@nuaa.edu.cn.
Adnan ShakoorDepartment of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. ashakoor2-c@my.cityu.edu.hk.
Changcheng WuCollege of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China. changchengwu@nuaa.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the autonomous manipulation strategies of biological cells utilizing optical tweezers, mainly including optical direct and indirect manipulation strategies. The typical and latest achievements in the optical manipulation of cells are presented, and the existing challenges for autonomous optical manipulation of biological cells are also introduced. Moreover, the integrations of optical tweezers with other manipulation tools are presented, which broadens the applications of optical tweezers in the biomedical manipulation areas and will also foster new developments in cell-based physiology and pathology studies, such as cell migration, single cell surgery, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

Indexed as

autonomous manipulationcell manipulationmicro/nano robotoptical tweezers

Identifiers

PMID30424178
PMCPMC6187456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.