ArticleMicromachines2018
Performance Analysis and Numerical Evaluation of Mixing in 3-D T-Shape Passive Micromixers.
Article in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative numerical and experimental evaluation of 3D-printed micromixers for biotechnological applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design and Analysis of a Passive Micromixer Based on Multiple Passages.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Consistent Evaluation Methods for Microfluidic Mixers.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Design and Mixing Analysis of a Passive Micromixer with Circulation Promoters.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Mixing Performance of a Passive Micromixer Based on Split-to-Circulate (STC) Flow Characteristics.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Design and Mixing Analysis of a Passive Micromixer Based on Curly Baffles.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Mixing Performance of a Passive Micromixer Based on Multiple Baffles and Submergence Scheme.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Mixing Performance of the Modified Tesla Micromixer with Tip Clearance.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Mixing Performance of a Passive Micro-Mixer with Mixing Units Stacked in Cross Flow Direction.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Mixing Enhancement of Non-Newtonian Shear-Thinning Fluid for a Kenics Micromixer.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) for Manufacturing of Microfluidic Micromixers: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Process Variables in Printed Microfluidic Micromixers.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Toward the Next Generation of Passive Micromixers: A Novel 3-D Design Approach.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Technical Model of Micro Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) Milling Suitable for Bottom Grooved Micromixer Design Optimization.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Single and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Three-Dimensional Unbalanced Split-and-Recombine Micromixer.Micromachines · 2019Article
- Laser-Inscribed Glass Microfluidic Device for Non-Mixing Flow of Miscible Solvents.Micromachines · 2018Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Passive Micromixers.Micromachines · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In micromixer devices, laminar characteristics of the flow domain and small diffusion constants of the fluid samples that are mixed characterize the mixing process. The advection dominant flow and transport processes that develop in these devices not only create significant challenges for numerical solution of the problem, but they are also the source of numerical errors which may lead to confusing performance evaluations that are reported in the literature. In this study, the finite volume method (FVM) and finite element method (FEM) are used to characterize these errors and critical issues in numerical performance evaluations are highlighted. In this study, we used numerical methods to evaluate the mixing characteristics of a typical T-shape passive micromixer for several flow and transport parameters using both FEM and FVM, although the numerical procedures described are also equally applicable to other geometric designs as well. The outcome of the study shows that the type of stabilization technique used in FEM is very important and should be documented and reported. Otherwise, erroneous mixing performance may be reported since the added artificial diffusion may significantly affect the mixing performance in the device. Similarly, when FVM methods are used, numerical diffusion errors may become important for certain unstructured discretization techniques that are used in the idealization of the solution domain. This point needs to be also analyzed and reported when FVM is used in performance evaluation of micromixer devices. The focus of this study is not on improving the mixing performance of micromixers. Instead, we highlight the bench scale characteristics of the solutions and the mixing evaluation procedures used when FVM and FEM are employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.