Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30424059›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2018

Digital Manufacturing of Selective Porous Barriers in Microchannels Using Multi-Material Stereolithography.

Yong Tae Kim, Kurt Castro, Nirveek Bhattacharjee, Albert Folch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Augmented 3D Printing for Multiscale Microphysiological Systems.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Digital Light Processing Bioprinting Advances for Microtissue Models.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Emerging Technologies in Multi-Material Bioprinting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Digital Manufacturing for Microfluidics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong Tae Kim
Kurt Castro
Nirveek BhattacharjeeORCID 0000-0003-3401-2651
Albert Folch

Funding

Microfluidic Device to Profile Chemosensitivity in Glioma Slice CulturesR01CA181445 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOLCH, ALBERT · 2014 to 2025
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a sequential stereolithographic co-printing process using two different resins for fabricating porous barriers in microfluidic devices. We 3D-printed microfluidic channels with a resin made of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (MW = 258) (PEG-DA-258), a UV photoinitiator, and a UV sensitizer. The porous barriers were created within the microchannels in a different resin made of either PEG-DA (MW = 575) (PEG-DA-575) or 40% (

Indexed as

diffusionmicrofluidicsmulti-material stereolithographyporous barrier

Identifiers

PMID30424059
PMCPMC6187461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.