ReviewMicromachines2018
Advances of Optofluidic Microcavities for Microlasers and Biosensors.
Review in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Progress in Gain Materials for Microlasers and Modern Digital Approaches for Biophotonics: From Dyes to Semiconductors.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Highly Accurate Pneumatically Tunable Optofluidic Distributed Feedback Dye Lasers.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Simplifying the complex: accessible microfluidic solutions for contemporary processes withinLab on a chip · 2022Review
- Optical Whispering-Gallery-Mode Microbubble Sensors.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Review of biosensing with whispering-gallery mode lasers.Light, science & applications · 2021Review
- Label-Free Optical Resonator-Based Biosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Advances in Optofluidics.Micromachines · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optofluidic microcavities with high Q factor have made rapid progress in recent years by using various micro-structures. On one hand, they are applied to microfluidic lasers with low excitation thresholds. On the other hand, they inspire the innovation of new biosensing devices with excellent performance. In this article, the recent advances in the microlaser research and the biochemical sensing field will be reviewed. The former will be categorized based on the structures of optical resonant cavities such as the Fabry⁻Pérot cavity and whispering gallery mode, and the latter will be classified based on the working principles into active sensors and passive sensors. Moreover, the difficulty of single-chip integration and recent endeavors will be briefly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.