ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018
BLocate: A Building Identification Scheme in GPS Denied Environments Using Smartphone Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wi-Fi Access Point Design Concept Targeting Indoor Positioning for Smartphones and IoT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- DeepLocate: Smartphone Based Indoor Localization with a Deep Neural Network Ensemble Classifier.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Indoor Positioning on Disparate Commercial Smartphones Using Wi-Fi Access Points Coverage Area.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Floor Identification Using Magnetic Field Data With Smartphone Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A Wavelet Scattering Feature Extraction Approach for Deep Neural Network Based Indoor Fingerprinting Localization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Indoor localization systems assume that the user's current building is known by the GPS (Global Positioning System). However, such assumptions do not hold true in GPS denied environments or where the GPS cannot determine the user's definite location. We present a novel solution to identify the building where the user is present now. The proposed building identification method works on the pervasive magnetic field using a smartphone. The accelerometer data determines the user's activity of being stationary or walking. An Artificial Neural Network is used to identify the user's activities and it shows good results. The magnetometer data is used to identify the user's current building using the fingerprinting approach. Contrary to a traditional fingerprinting approach which stores intensity values, we utilize the patterns formed by the magnetic field strength in the form of a Binary Grid (BG). The BG approach overcomes the limitation of Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) whose performance is degraded when the magnitude of the magnetic data is changed. The experiments are performed with Samsung Galaxy S8 for eight various buildings with different altitudes and number of floors in Yeungnam University, Korea. The results demonstrate that the proposed building identification method can potentially be deployed for building identification. The precision, UAR (Unweighted Average Recall), F score, and Cohen's Kappa values are used to determine the performance of the proposed system. The proposed systems shows very promising results. The system operates without any aid from any infrastructure dependent technologies like GPS or WiFi. Furthermore, we performed many experiments to investigate the impact of isolated points data to build fingerprint database on system's accuracy with 1 m and 2 m distance. Results illustrate that by trading off a minor accuracy, survey labor can be reduced by 50 percent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.