ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Innovative DendrisChips
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Improving CNV Detection Performance in Microarray Data Using a Machine Learning-Based Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Rapid and Accurate Diagnosis of Dermatophyte Infections Using the DendrisCHIPDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in the application of molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of infectious disease pathogens (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2023Review
- The DendrisCHIPDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dendrimers and Dendritic Materials: From Laboratory to Medical Practice in Infectious Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Which Current and Novel Diagnostic Avenues for Bacterial Respiratory Diseases?Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical microbiology is experiencing the emergence of the syndromic approach of diagnosis. This paradigm shift will require innovative technologies to detect rapidly, and in a single sample, multiple pathogens associated with an infectious disease. Here, we report on a multiplex technology based on DNA-microarray that allows detecting and discriminating 11 bacteria implicated in respiratory tract infection. The process requires a PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rDNA, a 30 min hybridization step on species-specific oligoprobes covalently linked on dendrimers coated glass slides (DendriChips
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.