Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30423601›Full record

Observational studyMaternal & child nutrition2019

A mixed method study evaluating the integration of pregnancy weight gain charts into antenatal care.

Susan de Jersey, Taylor Guthrie, Jeanette Tyler, Wan Yin Ling, Hilary Powlesland, Clare Byrne, Karen New

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan de JerseyDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-8558
Taylor GuthrieDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jeanette TylerWomen's and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Wan Yin LingSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hilary PowleslandDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Clare ByrneDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Karen NewWomen's and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6196-2452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring pregnancy weight can reduce excess gestational weight gain (GWG), and is recommended in clinical practice guidelines as part of routine care. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of routine weight monitoring using a pregnancy weight gain chart (PWGC), and assess health care professionals (HCPs) and pregnant women's attitudes and practices around its use. A semiquantitative survey was conducted with a consecutive sample of antenatal women at 16 and 36 weeks gestation. Women were weighed, and a PWGC audit done at 36 weeks gestation to assess adherence to chart use and GWG. A cross-sectional survey of antenatal HCPs at the Australian facility assessed staff attitudes and practices relating to weight monitoring and PWGC use. Of the 291 women surveyed, 68% reported being given a PWGC. Of the audited PWGCs (n = 258), 54% had less than three weights recorded, 36% had errors, and 3% were unused. All HCPs surveyed (n = 42) were aware of the PWGC, 63% reported using it to track GWG regularly and 26% believed it to be only the woman's responsibility (i.e., not the midwife's role) to complete it. Seventy-six percent reported they needed more training in counselling pregnant women, and insufficient time was a main barrier to weighing and conversing with women. It is feasible to implement a PWGC into routine antenatal care. Clarity over women's and HCPs responsibility for monitoring GWG and completion of the PWGC is needed. Training on correct PWGC use and counselling and workforce engagement are required to overcome barriers and support healthy GWG.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsAdultFemaleGestational Weight GainHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareProspective Studiesimplementationobesitypregnancy weight gainweight gain chartweight monitoring

Identifiers

PMID30423601
PMCPMC7199022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.