ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Approximate, simultaneous comparison of microbial genome architectures via syntenic anchoring of quiver representations.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transposon-sequencing across multiplemBio · 2025Article
- A comparative study of pan-genome methods for microbial organisms:Microbial genomics · 2021Article
- Methods and Developments in Graphical Pangenomics.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2021Review
- NovoGraph: Human genome graph construction from multiple long-readF1000Research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: A long-standing limitation in comparative genomic studies is the dependency on a reference genome, which hinders the spectrum of genetic diversity that can be identified across a population of organisms. This is especially true in the microbial world where genome architectures can significantly vary. There is therefore a need for computational methods that can simultaneously analyze the architectures of multiple genomes without introducing bias from a reference. Results: In this article, we present Ptolemy: a novel method for studying the diversity of genome architectures-such as structural variation and pan-genomes-across a collection of microbial assemblies without the need of a reference. Ptolemy is a 'top-down' approach to compare whole genome assemblies. Genomes are represented as labeled multi-directed graphs-known as quivers-which are then merged into a single, canonical quiver by identifying 'gene anchors' via synteny analysis. The canonical quiver represents an approximate, structural alignment of all genomes in a given collection encoding structural variation across (sub-) populations within the collection. We highlight various applications of Ptolemy by analyzing structural variation and the pan-genomes of different datasets composing of Mycobacterium, Saccharomyces, Escherichia and Shigella species. Our results show that Ptolemy is flexible and can handle both conserved and highly dynamic genome architectures. Ptolemy is user-friendly-requires only FASTA-formatted assembly along with a corresponding GFF-formatted file-and resource-friendly-can align 24 genomes in ∼10 mins with four CPUs and <2 GB of RAM. Availability and implementation: Github: https://github.com/AbeelLab/ptolemy. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.