ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
FLYCOP: metabolic modeling-based analysis and engineering microbial communities.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Advancing Plant Microbiome Research Through Host DNA Depletion Techniques.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Describing and Designing Microbial Community Metabolic Models In Silico: A Comprehensive Protocol Utilizing FLYCOP.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Constraint-Based Metabolic Modeling Approach for Microbial Communities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Insights into Microbial Enzymatic Biodegradation of Plastics and Microplastics: Technological Updates.ACS environmental Au · 2025Review
- Model-Guided Rational Construction of Escherichia coli Synthetic Consortia for Enhanced 2-Methylbutyric Acid Production.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- COmmunity and Single Microbe Optimisation System (COSMOS).NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Deciphering and designing microbial communities by genome-scale metabolic modelling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Assembly of functional microbial ecosystems: from molecular circuits to communities.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Engineering bacterial biocatalysts for the degradation of phthalic acid esters.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Engineering Microbial Consortia as Living Materials: Advances and Prospectives.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Review
- DyMMM-LEAPS: An ML-based framework for modulating evenness and stability in synthetic microbial communities.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Strategies for tailoring functional microbial synthetic communities.The ISME journal · 2024Review
- Community-scale models of microbiomes: Articulating metabolic modelling and metagenome sequencing.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- A structured evaluation of genome-scale constraint-based modeling tools for microbial consortia.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Microbiome engineering for bioremediation of emerging pollutants.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023Review
- Towards applications of genome-scale metabolic model-based approaches in designing synthetic microbial communities.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Metagenome-Scale Metabolic Network Suggests Folate Produced byMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- A metabolic modeling platform for the computation of microbial ecosystems in time and space (COMETS).Nature protocols · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Synthetic microbial communities begin to be considered as promising multicellular biocatalysts having a large potential to replace engineered single strains in biotechnology applications, in pharmaceutical, chemical and living architecture sectors. In contrast to single strain engineering, the effective and high-throughput analysis and engineering of microbial consortia face the lack of knowledge, tools and well-defined workflows. This manuscript contributes to fill this important gap with a framework, called FLYCOP (FLexible sYnthetic Consortium OPtimization), which contributes to microbial consortia modeling and engineering, while improving the knowledge about how these communities work. FLYCOP selects the best consortium configuration to optimize a given goal, among multiple and diverse configurations, in a flexible way, taking temporal changes in metabolite concentrations into account. Results: In contrast to previous systems optimizing microbial consortia, FLYCOP has novel characteristics to face up to new problems, to represent additional features and to analyze events influencing the consortia behavior. In this manuscript, FLYCOP optimizes a Synechococcus elongatus-Pseudomonas putida consortium to produce the maximum amount of bio-plastic (PHA, polyhydroxyalkanoate), and highlights the influence of metabolites exchange dynamics in a four auxotrophic Escherichia coli consortium with parallel growth. FLYCOP can also provide an explanation about biological evolution driving evolutionary engineering endeavors by describing why and how heterogeneous populations emerge from monoclonal ones. Availability and implementation: Code reproducing the study cases described in this manuscript are available on-line: https://github.com/beatrizgj/FLYCOP. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.