ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Fast characterization of segmental duplications in genome assemblies.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A complete genome for the common marmoset.Cell · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- HPRC2: A human pangenome reference with near-complete coverage of common genetic variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Personalized reference genome-based pipeline reveals comprehensive haplotype-resolved views of cancer genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Segmentally Duplicated Regulatory Elements Undergo Human-Specific Rewiring.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomes From 117 Vertebrate Species Reveal Rapidly Evolving Segmental-Duplication Landscapes.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity and regulatory features of human-specific NOTCH2NL duplications.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Population-scale Y chromosome assemblies reveal recurrent remodeling within constrained architectures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The diploid reference genome of a human embryonic stem cell line.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Donor-specific assemblies enhance somatic structural variant detection in complex genomic regions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Incomplete lineage sorting of segmental duplications defines the human chromosome 2 fusion site early during African great ape speciation.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Human acrocentric chromosome short armbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Segmentally duplicated regulatory elements undergo human-specific rewiring.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genomic signatures of subterranean lifestyle and ecological adaptation in Myospalax.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Article
- SegMantX: A Novel Tool for Detecting DNA Duplications Uncovers Prevalent Duplications in Plasmids.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Segmental duplications (SDs) or low-copy repeats, are segments of DNA > 1 Kbp with high sequence identity that are copied to other regions of the genome. SDs are among the most important sources of evolution, a common cause of genomic structural variation and several are associated with diseases of genomic origin including schizophrenia and autism. Despite their functional importance, SDs present one of the major hurdles for de novo genome assembly due to the ambiguity they cause in building and traversing both state-of-the-art overlap-layout-consensus and de Bruijn graphs. This causes SD regions to be misassembled, collapsed into a unique representation, or completely missing from assembled reference genomes for various organisms. In turn, this missing or incorrect information limits our ability to fully understand the evolution and the architecture of the genomes. Despite the essential need to accurately characterize SDs in assemblies, there has been only one tool that was developed for this purpose, called Whole-Genome Assembly Comparison (WGAC); its primary goal is SD detection. WGAC is comprised of several steps that employ different tools and custom scripts, which makes this strategy difficult and time consuming to use. Thus there is still a need for algorithms to characterize within-assembly SDs quickly, accurately, and in a user friendly manner. Results: Here we introduce SEgmental Duplication Evaluation Framework (SEDEF) to rapidly detect SDs through sophisticated filtering strategies based on Jaccard similarity and local chaining. We show that SEDEF accurately detects SDs while maintaining substantial speed up over WGAC that translates into practical run times of minutes instead of weeks. Notably, our algorithm captures up to 25% 'pairwise error' between segments, whereas previous studies focused on only 10%, allowing us to more deeply track the evolutionary history of the genome. Availability and implementation: SEDEF is available at https://github.com/vpc-ccg/sedef.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.