ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Learning structural motif representations for efficient protein structure search.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrastive learning unites sequence and structure in a global representation of protein space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Benchmarking protein sequence and structure search methods for remote homology detection.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Unsupervised learning reveals landscape of local structural motifs across protein classes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Fast protein structure searching using structure graph embeddings.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Zero-shot prediction of mutation effects with multimodal deep representation learning guides protein engineering.Cell research · 2024Article
- Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- To Affinity and Beyond: A Personal Reflection on the Design and Discovery of Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Fast protein structure comparison through effective representation learning with contrastive graph neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- EpitopeVec: linear epitope prediction using deep protein sequence embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- COMTOP: Protein Residue-Residue Contact Prediction through Mixed Integer Linear Optimization.Membranes · 2021Article
- Unsupervised protein embeddings outperform hand-crafted sequence and structure features at predicting molecular function.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Integrating thermodynamic and sequence contexts improves protein-RNA binding prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Given a protein of unknown function, fast identification of similar protein structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) is a critical step for inferring its biological function. Such structural neighbors can provide evolutionary insights into protein conformation, interfaces and binding sites that are not detectable from sequence similarity. However, the computational cost of performing pairwise structural alignment against all structures in PDB is prohibitively expensive. Alignment-free approaches have been introduced to enable fast but coarse comparisons by representing each protein as a vector of structure features or fingerprints and only computing similarity between vectors. As a notable example, FragBag represents each protein by a 'bag of fragments', which is a vector of frequencies of contiguous short backbone fragments from a predetermined library. Despite being efficient, the accuracy of FragBag is unsatisfactory because its backbone fragment library may not be optimally constructed and long-range interacting patterns are omitted. Results: Here we present a new approach to learning effective structural motif presentations using deep learning. We develop DeepFold, a deep convolutional neural network model to extract structural motif features of a protein structure. We demonstrate that DeepFold substantially outperforms FragBag on protein structural search on a non-redundant protein structure database and a set of newly released structures. Remarkably, DeepFold not only extracts meaningful backbone segments but also finds important long-range interacting motifs for structural comparison. We expect that DeepFold will provide new insights into the evolution and hierarchical organization of protein structural motifs. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/largelymfs/DeepFold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.