ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Off-target predictions in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing using deep learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- An overview and metanalysis of machine and deep learning-based CRISPR gRNA design tools.RNA biology · 2020Pooled it
- abCRISPR: deep learning-based design of abasic gRNA sequences for specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- An interpretable deep learning framework uncovers features governing CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Harnessing Deep Learning Models for Guide RNA Optimization and Off-Target Prediction in CRISPR Systems.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- CRISPR-MBTF: a multi-branch transformer fusion framework for CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-driven prediction of on-target activity, off-target risk, and repair outcomes in CRISPR/Cas9: current landscape and multi-scale perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Feature representation for explainable CRISPR off-target prediction and base editing efficiency.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Appraisal of CRISPR Technology as an Innovative Screening to Therapeutic Toolkit for Genetic Disorders.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Polymeric Nanomedicines for siRNA Delivery in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Emerging Therapeutic Strategies, Combination Approaches, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- A review of flavonoids at the crossroads of plant defense: integrating biotic and abiotic stress tolerance through AI- and CRISPR/Cas-guided metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CRISPR Gene Editing: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Directions in Precision Medicine.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology · 2026Review
- Advancing CRISPR with deep learning: A comprehensive review of models and databases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Similarity-based transfer learning with deep learning networks for accurate CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas genome editing for human therapeutics: Progress and challenges.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Tapping the microalgal potential: genetic precision and stress-induction for enhanced astaxanthin and biofuel production.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2025Review
- From Code to Life: The AI-Driven Revolution in Genome Editing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- CNN-Based Automatic Tablet Classification Using a Vibration-Controlled Bowl Feeder with Spiral Torque Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Based Models for CRISPR/Cas Off-Target Prediction.Small methods · 2025Review
- A versatile CRISPR/Cas9 system off-target prediction tool using language model.Communications biology · 2025Article
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: The prediction of off-target mutations in CRISPR-Cas9 is a hot topic due to its relevance to gene editing research. Existing prediction methods have been developed; however, most of them just calculated scores based on mismatches to the guide sequence in CRISPR-Cas9. Therefore, the existing prediction methods are unable to scale and improve their performance with the rapid expansion of experimental data in CRISPR-Cas9. Moreover, the existing methods still cannot satisfy enough precision in off-target predictions for gene editing at the clinical level. Results: To address it, we design and implement two algorithms using deep neural networks to predict off-target mutations in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing (i.e. deep convolutional neural network and deep feedforward neural network). The models were trained and tested on the recently released off-target dataset, CRISPOR dataset, for performance benchmark. Another off-target dataset identified by GUIDE-seq was adopted for additional evaluation. We demonstrate that convolutional neural network achieves the best performance on CRISPOR dataset, yielding an average classification area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 97.2% under stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Interestingly, the deep feedforward neural network can also be competitive at the average AUC of 97.0% under the same setting. We compare the two deep neural network models with the state-of-the-art off-target prediction methods (i.e. CFD, MIT, CROP-IT, and CCTop) and three traditional machine learning models (i.e. random forest, gradient boosting trees, and logistic regression) on both datasets in terms of AUC values, demonstrating the competitive edges of the proposed algorithms. Additional analyses are conducted to investigate the underlying reasons from different perspectives. Availability and implementation: The example code are available at https://github.com/MichaelLinn/off_target_prediction. The related datasets are available at https://github.com/MichaelLinn/off_target_prediction/tree/master/data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.