ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Computational enhancement of single-cell sequences for inferring tumor evolution.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic inference from single-cell RNA-seq data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Improving cellular phylogenies through the integrated use of mutation order and optimality principles.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- RobustTree: An adaptive, robust PCA algorithm for embedded tree structure recovery from single-cell sequencing data.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- A phylogenetic approach to study the evolution of somatic mutational processes in cancer.Communications biology · 2022Article
- BiTSC 2: Bayesian inference of tumor clonal tree by joint analysis of single-cell SNV and CNA data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- SCSilicon: a tool for synthetic single-cell DNA sequencing data generation.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- CellPhy: accurate and fast probabilistic inference of single-cell phylogenies from scDNA-seq data.Genome biology · 2022Article
- MOCA for Integrated Analysis of Gene Expression and Genetic Variation in Single Cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Somatic variant calling from single-cell DNA sequencing data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Tumors Are Evolutionary Island-Like Ecosystems.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- An Evolutionary Portrait of the Progenitor SARS-CoV-2 and Its Dominant Offshoots in COVID-19 Pandemic.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- An evolutionary portrait of the progenitor SARS-CoV-2 and its dominant offshoots in COVID-19 pandemic.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2021Article
- GRMT: Generative Reconstruction of Mutation Tree From Scratch Using Single-Cell Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Distance measures for tumor evolutionary trees.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- SCSsim: an integrated tool for simulating single-cell genome sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Molecular Biology and Evolution of Cancer: From Discovery to Action.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Tumor sequencing has entered an exciting phase with the advent of single-cell techniques that are revolutionizing the assessment of single nucleotide variation (SNV) at the highest cellular resolution. However, state-of-the-art single-cell sequencing technologies produce data with many missing bases (MBs) and incorrect base designations that lead to false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) detection of somatic mutations. While computational methods are available to make biological inferences in the presence of these errors, the accuracy of the imputed MBs and corrected FPs and FNs remains unknown. Results: Using computer simulated datasets, we assessed the robustness performance of four existing methods (OncoNEM, SCG, SCITE and SiFit) and one new method (BEAM). BEAM is a Bayesian evolution-aware method that improves the quality of single-cell sequences by using the intrinsic evolutionary information in the single-cell data in a molecular phylogenetic framework. Overall, BEAM and SCITE performed the best. Most of the methods imputed MBs with high accuracy, but effective detection and correction of FPs and FNs is a challenge, especially for small datasets. Analysis of an empirical dataset shows that computational methods can improve both the quality of tumor single-cell sequences and their utility for biological inference. In conclusion, tumor cells descend from pre-existing cells, which creates evolutionary continuity in single-cell sequencing datasets. This information enables BEAM and other methods to correctly impute missing data and incorrect base assignments, but correction of FPs and FNs remains challenging when the number of SNVs sampled is small relative to the number of cells sequenced. Availability and implementation: BEAM is available on the web at https://github.com/SayakaMiura/BEAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.