Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30423068›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Ontology-based validation and identification of regulatory phenotypes.

Maxat Kulmanov, Paul N Schofield, Georgios V Gkoutos, Robert Hoehndorf

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxat KulmanovComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, Computational Bioscience Research Centre, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Paul N SchofieldDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Georgios V GkoutosCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Robert HoehndorfComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, Computational Bioscience Research Centre, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SANIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Function annotations of gene products, and phenotype annotations of genotypes, provide valuable information about molecular mechanisms that can be utilized by computational methods to identify functional and phenotypic relatedness, improve our understanding of disease and pathobiology, and lead to discovery of drug targets. Identifying functions and phenotypes commonly requires experiments which are time-consuming and expensive to carry out; creating the annotations additionally requires a curator to make an assertion based on reported evidence. Support to validate the mutual consistency of functional and phenotype annotations as well as a computational method to predict phenotypes from function annotations, would greatly improve the utility of function annotations. Results: We developed a novel ontology-based method to validate the mutual consistency of function and phenotype annotations. We apply our method to mouse and human annotations, and identify several inconsistencies that can be resolved to improve overall annotation quality. We also apply our method to the rule-based prediction of regulatory phenotypes from functions and demonstrate that we can predict these phenotypes with Fmax of up to 0.647. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/phenogocon.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsComputational BiologyGene OntologyHumansMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID30423068
PMCPMC6129279
OpenAlexW2786164586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.