Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30423066›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Conditional generative adversarial network for gene expression inference.

Xiaoqian Wang, Kamran Ghasedi Dizaji, Heng Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deep Learning in Mining Biological Data.Cognitive computation · 2021
    Review
  17. Meta-learning with Latent Space Clustering in Generative Adversarial Network for Speaker Diarization.IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoqian WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kamran Ghasedi DizajiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Heng HuangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Imaging Genomics Based Brain Disease PredictionR01AG049371 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI HUANG, HENG · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The rapid progress of gene expression profiling has facilitated the prosperity of recent biological studies in various fields, where gene expression data characterizes various cell conditions and regulatory mechanisms under different experimental circumstances. Despite the widespread application of gene expression profiling and advances in high-throughput technologies, profiling in genome-wide level is still expensive and difficult. Previous studies found that high correlation exists in the expression pattern of different genes, such that a small subset of genes can be informative to approximately describe the entire transcriptome. In the Library of Integrated Network-based Cell-Signature program, a set of ∼1000 landmark genes have been identified that contain ∼80% information of the whole genome and can be used to predict the expression of remaining genes. For a cost-effective profiling strategy, traditional methods measure the profiles of landmark genes and then infer the expression of other target genes via linear models. However, linear models do not have the capacity to capture the non-linear associations in gene regulatory networks. Results: As a flexible model with high representative power, deep learning models provide an alternate to interpret the complex relation among genes. In this paper, we propose a deep learning architecture for the inference of target gene expression profiles. We construct a novel conditional generative adversarial network by incorporating both the adversarial and ℓ1-norm loss terms in our model. Unlike the smooth and blurry predictions resulted by mean squared error objective, the coupled adversarial and ℓ1-norm loss function leads to more accurate and sharp predictions. We validate our method under two different settings and find consistent and significant improvements over all the comparing methods.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenomeLinear Models

Identifiers

PMID30423066
PMCPMC6129263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.