Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30423024›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019

Loss of function of NF1 is a mechanism of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy in lobular breast cancer.

E S Sokol, Y X Feng, D X Jin, A Basudan, A V Lee, J M Atkinson, J Chen, P J Stephens, G M Frampton, P B Gupta and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinicogenomic Landscape and Function ofJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. NF1-depleted ERScience translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Recent advances and updated highlights in breast cancer pathologic diagnosis: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E S SokolFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge. Electronic address: esokol@foundationmedicine.com.
Y X FengDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
D X JinFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
A BasudanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Womens Cancer Research Center, Department of Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh.
A V LeeUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Womens Cancer Research Center, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh.
J M AtkinsonUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Womens Cancer Research Center, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh.
J ChenUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Womens Cancer Research Center, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh.
P J StephensFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
G M FramptonFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
P B GuptaDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
J S RossFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
J H ChungFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
S OesterreichUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Womens Cancer Research Center, Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh.
S M AliFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
R J HartmaierFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
Foundation Medicine (United States)University of Pittsburgh · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USCancer Research Center · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) as a disease entity distinct from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) has merited focused studies of the genomic landscape, but those to date are largely limited to the assessment of early-stage cancers. Given that genomic alterations develop as acquired resistance to endocrine therapy, studies on refractory ILC are needed. Patients and methods: Tissue from 336 primary-enriched, breast-biopsied ILC and 485 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive IDC and metastatic biopsy specimens from 180 ILC and 191 ER-positive IDC patients was assayed with hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling for short variant, indel, copy number variants, and rearrangements in up to 395 cancer-related genes. Results: Whereas ESR1 alterations are enriched in the metastases of both ILC and IDC compared with breast specimens, NF1 alterations are enriched only in ILC metastases (mILC). NF1 alterations are predominantly under loss of heterozygosity (11/14, 79%), are mutually exclusive with ESR1 mutations [odds ratio = 0.24, P < 0.027] and are frequently polyclonal in ctDNA assays. Assessment of paired specimens shows that NF1 alterations arise in the setting of acquired resistance. An in vitro model of CDH1 mutated ER-positive breast cancer demonstrates that NF1 knockdown confers a growth advantage in the presence of 4-hydroxy tamoxifen. Our study further identified a significant increase in tumor mutational burden (TMB) in mILCs relative to breast ILCs or metastatic IDCs (8.9% >20 mutations/mb; P < 0.001). Most TMB-high mILCs harbor an APOBEC trinucleotide signature (14/16; 88%). Conclusions: This study identifies alteration of NF1 as enriched specifically in mILC. Mutual exclusivity with ESR1 alterations, polyclonality in relapsed ctDNA, and de novo acquisition suggest a role for NF1 loss in endocrine therapy resistance. Since NF1 loss leads to RAS/RAF kinase activation, patients may benefit from a matched inhibitor. Moreover, for an independent subset of mILC, TMB was elevated relative to breast ILC, suggesting possible benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeurofibromin 1Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeurofibromin 1NF1 protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID30423024
PMCPMC6336006
OpenAlexW2900579069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.