Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30422994›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Impact of chronic total occlusion lesion length on six-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes.

Jihun Ahn, Seung-Woon Rha, ByoungGeol Choi, Se Yeon Choi, Jae Kyeong Byun, Ahmed Mashaly, Kareem Abdelshafi, Yoonjee Park, Won Young Jang, Woohyeun Kim and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Versus Drug-Eluting Stent-Only Treatment for Large Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jihun AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Korea.
Seung-Woon RhaCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-9852
ByoungGeol ChoiDepartment of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea.
Se Yeon ChoiDepartment of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Kyeong ByunDepartment of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea.
Ahmed MashalyCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kareem AbdelshafiCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yoonjee ParkCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Won Young JangCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Woohyeun KimCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jah Yeon ChoiCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
EunJin ParkCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Oh NaCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Cheol Ung ChoiCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
EungJu KimCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Chang Gyu ParkCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hong Seog SeoCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Joo OhCardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
JinSu ByeonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4706-2298
SangHo ParkCardiovascular Center, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.
HyeYon YuDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea.
Korea University Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful management of chronic total occlusion (CTO)by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is known to be associated with better clinical outcomes than failed PCI. However, whether angiographic and clinical outcomes following PCI for long CTO lesions differ from those following PCI for short CTO lesions in the drug eluting stent (DES) era remains unknown. We therefore investigated whether CTO lesion length can significantly influence6-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes following successful CTO PCI. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 235 consecutive patients who underwent successful CTO intervention were allocated into either the long or short CTO group according to CTO lesion length. Six-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes were then compared between the 2groups. We found that baseline clinical characteristics were generally similar between the 2 groups. Exceptions were prior PCI, which was more frequent in the long CTO group, and bifurcation lesions, which were more frequent in the short CTO group. Apart from intimal dissection, which was more frequent in the long than short CTO group, in-hospital complications were also similarly frequent between the 2groups. Furthermore, both groups had similar angiographic outcomes at 6 months and clinical outcomes at 2 years. However, the incidence of repeat PCI(predominantly target vessel revascularization),was higher in the long than short CTO group, with our multivariate analysis identifying long CTO as an important predictor of repeat PCI (odds ratio, 4.26;95% confidence interval, 1.53-11.9; p = 0.006).

conclusionThe safety profile, 6-month angiographic, and 2-year clinical outcomes of CTO PCI were similar between patients with long and short CTO. However, there was a higher incidence of repeat PCI in long CTO patients despite successful PCI with DESs.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAgedCoronary OcclusionDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30422994
PMCPMC6233918
OpenAlexW2951031198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.