Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30422863›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2019

Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Report Developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive International Peer Support Collaborative.

Joanne McPeake, Eliotte L Hirshberg, Leeann M Christie, Kelly Drumright, Kimberley Haines, Catherine L Hough, Joel Meyer, Dorothy Wade, Adair Andrews, Rita Bakhru and 35 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Beyond Survival: Lessons From a Research Journey in Critical Care Recovery Science.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 'We Don't Have to Prove to People How We're Feeling': Understanding the Role of Peer Support Groups in Countering Epistemic Injustices in Long COVID at a US Centre.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors.

Joanne McPeakeNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Eliotte L HirshbergCenter for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT.
Leeann M ChristieDell Children's Medical Centre, Austin, TX.
Kelly DrumrightVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Kimberley HainesWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Catherine L HoughDepartment of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Joel MeyerGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Dorothy WadeUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Adair AndrewsSociety of Critical Care Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Rita BakhruPulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy & Immunologic Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
Samantha BatesWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John A BarwiseVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Julie BastaracheVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Sarah J BeesleyIntermountain Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Murray, UT.
Leanne M BoehmVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN.
Sheryl BrownNorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL.
Alison S ClayDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Penelope FirshmanDepartment of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Steven GreenbergEvanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Wendy HarrisUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher HillVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Carol HodgsonAustralia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clare HoldsworthWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aluko A HopeJay B Langer Critical Care System, New York, NY.
Ramona O HopkinsCenter for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT.
David C J HowellCritical Care Unit, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Anna JanssenGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
James C JacksonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Annie JohnsonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Erin K KrossDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Daniela LamasDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Belinda MacLeod-SmithWestern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ruth MandelNorthShore University Health System - Evanston Hospital, Chicago, IL.
John MarshallBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Mark E MikkelsenDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA.
Megan NackinoUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Tara QuasimNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Carla M SevinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Andrew SlackDepartment of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Rachel SpurrDepartment of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Mary StillEmory University Hospital (Emory Healthcare), Atlanta, GA.
Carol ThompsonCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Gerald WeinhouseDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
M Elizabeth WilcoxDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Theodore J IwashynaCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

Training to Advance Care Through Implementation Science in Cardiac And Lung Illnesses (TACTICAL)K12HL138039 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARNES, GEOFFREY DOUGLAS, PRESCOTT, HALLIE CHRISTINE · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
Vanderbilt Scholars in T4 Translational Research (V-STTaR) ProgramK12HL137943 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRIPALANI, SUNIL, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Cognitive Motor Interference Assessment for Improving Neurologic and Physical Disability Outcomes in Survivors of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (CAMINANDO) Phase IIK01HL140279 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HOPE, ALUKO A. · 2018 to 2022
$885k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL140279NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL137943NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients and caregivers can experience a range of physical, psychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge. The use of peer support has been proposed as an innovative support mechanism.

designWe sought to identify technical, safety, and procedural aspects of existing operational models of peer support, among the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive Peer Support Collaborative. We also sought to categorize key distinctions between these models and elucidate barriers and facilitators to implementation. SUBJECTS AND

settingSeventeen Thrive sites from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia were represented by a range of healthcare professionals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsVia an iterative process of in-person and email/conference calls, members of the Collaborative defined the key areas on which peer support models could be defined and compared, collected detailed self-reports from all sites, reviewed the information, and identified clusters of models. Barriers and challenges to implementation of peer support models were also documented. Within the Thrive Collaborative, six general models of peer support were identified: community based, psychologist-led outpatient, models-based within ICU follow-up clinics, online, groups based within ICU, and peer mentor models. The most common barriers to implementation were recruitment to groups, personnel input and training, sustainability and funding, risk management, and measuring success.

conclusionsA number of different models of peer support are currently being developed to help patients and families recover and grow in the postcritical care setting.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial SupportContinuity of Patient CareCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsPatient DischargeSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID30422863
PMCPMC6719778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.