Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30422351›Full record

ArticleImmunology and cell biology2019

Defining the in vivo characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia cells behavior by intravital imaging.

Delfim Duarte, Saoirse Amarteifio, Heather Ang, Isabella Y Kong, Nicola Ruivo, Gunnar Pruessner, Edwin D Hawkins, Cristina Lo Celso

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology and cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Imaging Approaches in Cancer Biology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multiphoton intravital microscopy of rodents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Delfim DuarteDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-0211
Saoirse AmarteifioDepartment of Mathematics, Huxley Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Heather AngDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Isabella Y KongThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Nicola RuivoDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Gunnar PruessnerDepartment of Mathematics, Huxley Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Edwin D HawkinsDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Cristina Lo CelsoDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Imperial College London · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11831Cancer Research UK 26770Cancer Research UK C36195/A1183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients have a poor response to conventional chemotherapy. The survival of chemoresistant cells is thought to depend on leukemia-bone marrow (BM) microenvironment interactions, which are not well understood. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis has been proposed to support AML growth but was not studied at the single AML cell level. We recently showed that T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cells are highly motile in the BM; however, the characteristics of AML cell migration within the BM remain undefined. Here, we characterize the in vivo migratory behavior of AML cells and their response to chemotherapy and CXCR4 antagonism, using high-resolution 2-photon and confocal intravital microscopy of mouse calvarium BM and the well-established MLL-AF9-driven AML mouse model. We used the Notch1-driven T-ALL model as a benchmark comparison and AMD3100 for CXCR4 antagonism experiments. We show that AML cells are migratory, and in contrast with T-ALL, chemoresistant AML cells become less motile. Moreover, and in contrast with T-ALL, the in vivo exploratory behavior of expanding and chemoresistant AML cells is unaffected by AMD3100. These results expand our understanding of AML cells-BM microenvironment interactions, highlighting unique traits of leukemia of different lineages.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzylaminesBone MarrowCell Line, TumorChemokine CXCL12CyclamsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHeterocyclic CompoundsIntravital MicroscopyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonReceptors, CXCR4Antineoplastic AgentsBenzylaminesChemokine CXCL12CyclamsHeterocyclic CompoundsplerixaforReceptors, CXCR4Acute myeloid leukemia cellschemokinesintravital imaginglymphoblastic leukemia

Identifiers

PMID30422351
PMCPMC6446728
OpenAlexW2901871195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.