Trial reportJAMA oncology2019
Survival Outcomes in Patients With Previously Untreated BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01721772 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of BMS-936558 vs Dacarbazine in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 182 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of BMS-936558 vs Dacarbazine in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
Who cites it
182 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 340 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic treatment strategies for BRAF wild-type metastatic unresectable melanoma: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Analysis of Cancer Survival Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After Statistical Adjustment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Pooled it
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Anti-PD-1, Anti-PD-L1, Anti-CTLA-4 and Their Combined Immunotherapy in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Assessment of Treatment Effects and Long-term Benefits in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials Using the Flexible Parametric Cure Model: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship Between Progression-Free Survival, Objective Response Rate, and Overall Survival in Clinical Trials of PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative Risks of High-Grade Adverse Events Among FDA-Approved Systemic Therapies in Advanced Melanoma: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Immune-Related Adverse Events of Anti-PD-1 Drugs in Randomized Controlled Trials.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Phase 1/2 study of pegenzileukin, a pegylated recombinant non-alpha IL-2, with cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced unresectable or metastatic skin cancers.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- A phase II study of retifanlimab, a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with solid tumors (POD1UM-203).ESMO open · 2024Trial
- TMB and Inflammatory Gene Expression Associated with Clinical Outcomes following Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma.Cancer immunology research · 2021Trial
- Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab in First-Line Metastatic Melanoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021Trial
- Nivolumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ATTRACTION-2): 3-year update and outcome of treatment beyond progression with nivolumab.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021Trial
- Long-term real-world experience with ipilimumab and non-ipilimumab therapies in advanced melanoma: the IMAGE study.BMC cancer · 2021Trial
- Five-year survival with nivolumab in previously untreated Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent malignant melanoma.The Journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- Five-Year Outcomes With Nivolumab in Patients With Wild-TypeJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Trial
- Trial
122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: This analysis provides long-term follow-up in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma receiving first-line therapy based on anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitors. Objective: To compare the 3-year survival with nivolumab vs that with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial analyzed 3-year overall survival data from the randomized, controlled, double-blind CheckMate 066 phase 3 clinical trial. For this ongoing, multicenter academic institution trial, patients were enrolled from January 2013 through February 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with confirmed unresectable previously untreated stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 but without a BRAF mutation. Interventions: Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxic events with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). Main Outcome and Measure: Overall survival. Results: At minimum follow-ups of 38.4 months among 210 participants in the nivolumab group (median age, 64 years [range, 18-86 years]; 57.6% male) and 38.5 months among 208 participants in the dacarbazine group (median age, 66 years [range, 25-87 years]; 60.1% male), 3-year overall survival rates were 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1%-57.9%) and 21.6% (95% CI, 16.1%-27.6%), respectively. The median overall survival was 37.5 months (95% CI, 25.5 months-not reached) in the nivolumab group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .001). Complete and partial responses, respectively, were reported for 19.0% (40 of 210) and 23.8% (50 of 210) of patients in the nivolumab group compared with 1.4% (3 of 208) and 13.0% (27 of 208) of patients in the dacarbazine group. Additional analyses were performed on outcomes with subsequent therapies. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.0% (31 of 206) of nivolumab-treated patients and in 17.6% (36 of 205) of dacarbazine-treated patients. There were no deaths due to study drug toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: Nivolumab led to improved 3-year overall survival vs dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01721772.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.