Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30422235›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Effect of Lanreotide on Kidney Function in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: The DIPAK 1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Esther Meijer, Folkert W Visser, Rene M M van Aerts, Charles J Blijdorp, Niek F Casteleijn, Hedwig M A D'Agnolo, Shosha E I Dekker, Joost P H Drenth, Johan W de Fijter, Maatje D A van Gastel and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01616927 (The DIPAK 1 Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01616927 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

The DIPAK 1 Study: A Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Lanreotide to Halt Disease Progression in ADPKD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2012 to 2017Enrolled300ConditionsAutosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD)ArmsLanreotide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Medical Management of Polycystic Liver Disease: A Position Statement From the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of Clinical Trial Design in ADPKD.Kidney international reports · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. KDIGO 2025 ADPKD guideline: a commentary on diagnosis and management of hepatopancreatic manifestations by the ERA Working Group Genes & Kidney.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. End Point Selection in ADPKD Clinical Trials.Kidney international reports · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Esther MeijerDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Folkert W VisserDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rene M M van AertsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Charles J BlijdorpDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Niek F CasteleijnDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Hedwig M A D'AgnoloDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Shosha E I DekkerDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Joost P H DrenthDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Johan W de FijterDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maatje D A van GastelDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Tom J GeversDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marten A LantingaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Monique LosekootDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
A Lianne MesschendorpDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Myrte K NeijenhuisDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Michelle J PenaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University, Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Dorien J M PetersDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mahdi SalihDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Darius SoonawalaDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Edwin M SpithovenDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jack F WetzelsDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Robert ZietseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ron T GansevoortDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
DIPAK-1 Investigators
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLHaga Hospital · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is characterized by progressive cyst formation in both kidneys and loss of renal function, eventually leading to a need for kidney replacement therapy. There are limited therapeutic management options. Objective: To examine the effect of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide on the rate of kidney function loss in patients with later-stage ADPKD. Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label randomized clinical trial with blinded end point assessment that included 309 patients with ADPKD from July 2012 to March 2015 at 4 nephrology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were 18 to 60 years of age and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Follow-up of the 2.5-year trial ended in August 2017. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either lanreotide (120 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks) in addition to standard care (n = 153) or standard care only (target blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg; n = 152). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was annual change in eGFR assessed as slope through eGFR values during the 2.5-year treatment phase. Secondary outcomes included change in eGFR before vs after treatment, incidence of worsening kidney function (start of dialysis or 30% decrease in eGFR), change in total kidney volume and change in quality of life (range: 1 [not bothered] to 5 [extremely bothered]). Results: Among the 309 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 48.4 [7.3] years; 53.4% women), 261 (85.6%) completed the trial. Annual rate of eGFR decline for the lanreotide vs the control group was -3.53 vs -3.46 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (difference, -0.08 [95% CI, -0.71 to 0.56]; P = .81). There were no significant differences for incidence of worsening kidney function (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.49 to 1.52]; P = .87), change in eGFR (-3.58 vs -3.45; difference, -0.13 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year [95% CI, -1.76 to 1.50]; P = .88), and change in quality of life (0.05 vs 0.07; difference, -0.03 units per year [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.08]; P = .67). The rate of growth in total kidney volume was lower in the lanreotide group than the control group (4.15% vs 5.56%; difference, -1.33% per year [95% CI, -2.41% to -0.24%]; P = .02). Adverse events in the lanreotide vs control group included injection site discomfort (32% vs 0.7%), injection site papule (5.9% vs 0%), loose stools (91% vs 6.6%), abdominal discomfort (79% vs 20%), and hepatic cyst infections (5.2% vs 0%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with later-stage autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, treatment with lanreotide compared with standard care did not slow the decline in kidney function over 2.5 years of follow-up. These findings do not support the use of lanreotide for treatment of later-stage autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01616927.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicPolycystic Kidney, Autosomal DominantQuality of LifeRenal DialysisSingle-Blind MethodSomatostatinTreatment OutcomelanreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID30422235
PMCPMC6248170
OpenAlexW2898525585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.