ArticleJAMA internal medicine2018
Association of Frequency of Organic Food Consumption With Cancer Risk: Findings From the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk: Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of organic foods on chronic diseases and health perception: a systematic review of the evidence.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Potential Health Benefits of a Diet Rich in Organic Fruit and Vegetables versus a Diet Based on Conventional Produce: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Sustainable Diets and Cancer: a Systematic Review.Current nutrition reports · 2022Pooled it
- Lipid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Is There a Link? A New Focus and Meta-Analysis.European journal of breast health · 2022Pooled it
- Association between pesticide exposure and colorectal cancer risk and incidence: A systematic review.Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food Consumption: Is There a Measurable Benefit on Human Health?Nutrients · 2019Pooled it
- Fertilizer Type Affects Stable Isotope Ratios of Nitrogen in Human Blood Plasma─Results from Two-Year Controlled Agricultural Field Trials and a Randomized Crossover Dietary Intervention Study.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2022Trial
- Review
- The association between plant protein intake and cancer risk: a prospective cohort study.Nutrition journal · 2026Article
- Peer-led plant-based cooking workshops for post-cancer patients: an observational pilot study on dietary practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Observational
- UrinaryMetabolites · 2025Article
- Relationship between sustainable food literacy, organic food consumption and climate change awareness and worry in Türkiye.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Dietary consumption trajectory profiles over time of French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort (2014-2022): multicriteria analysis of sustainability.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Observational
- Sustainable diets and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Is Diet Perceived as a Cancer Risk Factor? Lay Perceptions in a Representative French Sample.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- The Level of Adherence to Organic Food Consumption and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Stable isotopes as a predictor for organic or conventional classification of berries and vegetables.PloS one · 2025Article
- A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial on exposure and effects of pesticides consumption - the PEST-EXPO Brazil study.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although organic foods are less likely to contain pesticide residues than conventional foods, few studies have examined the association of organic food consumption with cancer risk. Objective: To prospectively investigate the association between organic food consumption and the risk of cancer in a large cohort of French adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based prospective cohort study among French adult volunteers, data were included from participants with available information on organic food consumption frequency and dietary intake. For 16 products, participants reported their consumption frequency of labeled organic foods (never, occasionally, or most of the time). An organic food score was then computed (range, 0-32 points). The follow-up dates were May 10, 2009, to November 30, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study estimated the risk of cancer in association with the organic food score (modeled as quartiles) using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential cancer risk factors. Results: Among 68 946 participants (78.0% female; mean [SD] age at baseline, 44.2 [14.5] years), 1340 first incident cancer cases were identified during follow-up, with the most prevalent being 459 breast cancers, 180 prostate cancers, 135 skin cancers, 99 colorectal cancers, 47 non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and 15 other lymphomas. High organic food scores were inversely associated with the overall risk of cancer (hazard ratio for quartile 4 vs quartile 1, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88; P for trend = .001; absolute risk reduction, 0.6%; hazard ratio for a 5-point increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: A higher frequency of organic food consumption was associated with a reduced risk of cancer. If these findings are confirmed, further research is necessary to determine the underlying factors involved in this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.