Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30422157›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2019

Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Jonathan H Lass, Beth Ann Benetz, Sanjay V Patel, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Robert O'Brien, Allison R Ayala, Maureen G Maguire, Yassine J Daoud, Mark A Greiner, Sadeer B Hannush and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Systemic diseases and the cornea.Experimental eye research · 2021
    Review
  18. Mitophagy: An Emerging Target in Ocular Pathology.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan H LassCornea Image Analysis Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Beth Ann BenetzCornea Image Analysis Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sanjay V PatelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Loretta B Szczotka-FlynnCornea Image Analysis Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Robert O'BrienJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Allison R AyalaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Maureen G MaguireCenter for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Yassine J DaoudThe Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mark A GreinerUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.
Sadeer B HannushSadeer Hannush, P. C., Langhorne, Pennsylvania.
W Barry LeeEye Consultants of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
Thomas F MaugerThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center-Havener Eye Institute, Columbus.
Harry J MenegayCornea Image Analysis Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Mark D MifflinMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Michael B RaizmanOphthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer Rose-NussbaumerUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Robert L SchultzeCornea Consultants of Albany, Slingerlands, New York.
Gregory A SchmidtIowa Lions Eye Bank, Iowa City.
Alan SugarKellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mark A TerryDevers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon.
David D VerdierVerdier Eye Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Cornea Preservation Time Study Group
Case Western Reserve University · USJaeb Center for Health Research · USChicago Cornea Consultants (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USLegacy Health · USMayo Clinic · USMinnesota Eye Consultants · USMinnesota Lions Eye Bank · USOphthalmic Consultants of Boston · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Determining factors associated with endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) could improve long-term graft survival. Objective: To evaluate the associations of donor, recipient, and operative factors with endothelial cell density (ECD) 3 years after DSAEK in the Cornea Preservation Time Study. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a secondary analysis of data collected in a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial. Forty US clinical sites with 70 surgeons participated, with donor corneas provided by 23 US eye banks. Individuals undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema were included. Interventions: The DSAEK procedure, with random assignment of a donor cornea with a preservation time of 0 to 7 days or 8 to 14 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Endothelial cell density at 3 years as determined by a reading center from eye bank and clinical specular or confocal central endothelial images. Results: The study included 1090 participants (median age, 70 years) with 1330 affected eyes (240 bilateral cases [22.0%]), who underwent DSAEK for Fuchs dystrophy (1255 eyes [94.4%]) or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema (PACE) (75 eyes [5.6%]). Of these, 801 eyes (60.2%) belonged to women and 1207 (90.8%) to white individuals. A total of 749 participants (913 eyes; 164 [21.9%] bilateral cases) had functioning grafts with acceptable endothelial images preoperatively and at 3 years postoperatively and were included in this analysis. Factors associated with a lower ECD at 3 years (estimated effect with 99% CI) in the final multivariable model included donors with diabetes (-103 [-196 to -9] cells/mm2), lower screening ECD (-234 [-331 to -137] per 500 cells/mm2), recipient diagnosis of PACE (-257 [-483 to -31] in cells/mm2), and operative complications (-324 [-516 to -133] in cells/mm2). Endothelial cell loss (ECL) from a preoperative measurement to a 3-year postoperative measurement was 47% (99% CI, 42%-52%) for participants receiving tissue from donors with diabetes vs 43% (99% CI, 39%-48%) without diabetes; it was 53% (99% CI, 44%-62%) for participants diagnosed with PACE vs 44% (99% CI, 39%-49%) for those diagnosed with Fuchs dystrophy, and 55% (99% CI, 48%-63%) in participants who experienced operative complications vs 44% (99% CI, 39%-48%) in those who did not. No other donor, recipient, or operative factors were significantly associated with 3-year ECD. Conclusions and Relevance: Donor diabetes, lower screening ECD, a PACE diagnosis in the recipient, and operative complications were associated with lower ECD at 3 years after DSAEK surgery and may be associated with long-term graft success. While causation cannot be inferred, further studies on the association of donor diabetes and PACE in recipients with lower 3-year ECD warrant further study.

Indexed as

CorneaDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyTissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountChildCorneal EdemaCorneal Endothelial Cell LossDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, CornealFemaleFuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID30422157
PMCPMC6439830
OpenAlexW2898169207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.