Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30422029›Full record

ReviewAutophagy2019

Vacuolar hydrolysis and efflux: current knowledge and unanswered questions.

Katherine R Parzych, Daniel J Klionsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autophagy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multifunctional Roles of Autophagy in Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Omic AI reveals new autophagy regulators from the Atg1 interactome inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interactome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. The Toxoplasma plant-like vacuolar compartment (PLVAC).The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine R Parzycha Life Sciences Institute, and Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-0396
Daniel J Klionskya Life Sciences Institute, and Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-8118
University of Michigan · US

Funding

The mechanism and regulation of autophagyR35GM131919 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DANIEL J. KLIONSKY · 2019 to 2026
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrolysis within the vacuole in yeast and the lysosome in mammals is required for the degradation and recycling of a multitude of substrates, many of which are delivered to the vacuole/lysosome by autophagy. In humans, defects in lysosomal hydrolysis and efflux can have devastating consequences, and contribute to a class of diseases referred to as lysosomal storage disorders. Despite the importance of these processes, many of the proteins and regulatory mechanisms involved in hydrolysis and efflux are poorly understood. In this review, we describe our current knowledge of the vacuolar/lysosomal degradation and efflux of a vast array of substrates, focusing primarily on what is known in the yeast

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansHydrolysisLysosomesMacromolecular SubstancesModels, BiologicalVacuolesMacromolecular SubstancesAutophagyeffluxglutathionehydrolaselysosomepolyphosphateproteolysisvacuole

Identifiers

PMID30422029
PMCPMC6333459
OpenAlexW2901478815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.