Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30421728›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Health Care Clinics in Central Bosnia.

Marijan Marjanović, Davorka Vrdoljak, Valerija Bralić Lang, Ozren Polašek, Vedran Đido, Marinka Kašćel Fišić, Ivanka Mađar Šimić, Danijela Dodig, Marina Radoš Perić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marijan MarjanovićFaculty of Health Care, University "Vitez", Vitez, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Davorka VrdoljakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Valerija Bralić LangPrivate Family Physician Office Affiliated to University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ozren PolašekDepartment of Global Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Vedran ĐidoFaculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Marinka Kašćel FišićDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Centre Novi Travnik, Novi Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Ivanka Mađar ŠimićDepartment of Surgery, Health Centre Novi Travnik, Novi Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Danijela DodigDepartment of Family Medicine, Health Centre Novi Travnik, Novi Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Marina Radoš PerićDepartment of Family Medicine, Health Centre Novi Travnik, Novi Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The goal of this research was to determine the frequency of clinical inertia of general practice physicians in the region of Central Bosnia in healthcare for type 2 diabetes patients, to analyze characteristics of patients and physicians, as well as glucose regulation during clinical inertia, and, on the basis of these indicators, give recommendations for reducing clinical inertia. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study included 29 doctors, family physicians, or general practitioners, who collected data in a total sample of 541 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients from July to November 2017. The research was conducted using 2 questionnaires. The glucose concentration in plasma and the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were determined. Concertation of cholesterol, triglycerides, AST, and ALT were also measured. After the collection, new data were processed and the degree of clinical inertia was determined. RESULTS Levels of HbA1c ranged from 4.3% to 13.0%, and 38.4% of all patients had HbA1c level higher than 7.5%, while 8.3% of them had HbA1c level 9.0% or higher. Clinical inertia in our research was 12.6% out of all patients and 48.2% were referred to a specialist by their doctor. CONCLUSIONS For better regulation of glycemia and reduction of clinical inertia with type 2 diabetes patients, more specialized training is needed for selected physicians. Strengthening of primary healthcare and encouraging doctors to perform procedures can contribute to better outcomes of treatment, lower clinical inertia, and better education of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood GlucoseBosnia and HerzegovinaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Family PracticeFemaleGeneral PractitionersGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID30421728
PMCPMC6243831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.