ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Correcting image blur in spiral, retraced in/out (RIO) acquisitions using a maximized energy objective.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A retraced spiral strategy with semi-automatic deblurring for volumetric thermometry.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Real-time water/fat imaging at 0.55T with spiral out-in-out-in sampling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Concomitant magnetic-field compensation for 2D spiral-ring turbo spin-echo imaging at 0.55T and 1.5T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- SPRING-RIO TSE: 2D TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- A preclinical study of diffusion-weighted MRI contrast as an early indicator of thermal ablation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImages acquired with spiral k-space trajectories can suffer from off-resonance image blur. Previous work showed that averaging 2 images acquired with a retraced, in/out (RIO) trajectory self-corrects image blur so long as off-resonant spins accrue less than 1 half-cycle of relative phase over the readout. Practical scenarios frequently exceed this threshold. Here, we derive and characterize a more-robust off-resonance image blur correction method for RIO acquisitions.
methodsPhantom and human volunteer data were acquired using a RIO trajectory with readout durations ranging from 4 to 60 ms. The resulting images were deblurred using 3 candidate methods: conventional linear correction of the component images; semiautomatic deblurring of the component images using an established minimized phase objective function; and semiautomatic deblurring of the average of the component images using a maximized energy objective function, derived below. Deblurring errors were estimated relative to images acquired with 4 ms readouts.
resultsAll 3 methods converged to similar solutions in cases where less than 2 and 4 cycles of phase accrued over the readout in in vivo and phantom images, respectively (<13 ms readout at 3T). Above this threshold, the linear and minimized phase methods introduced several errors. The maximized energy function provided accurate deblurring so long as less than 6 and 10 cycles of phase accrued over the readout in in vivo and phantom images, respectively (<34 ms readout at 3T).
conclusionThe maximized energy objective function can accurately deblur RIO acquisitions over a wide spectrum of off resonance frequencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.