Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30421308›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in treatment of internal hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Sameh Hany Emile, Hossam Elfeki, Ahmad Sakr, Mostafa Shalaby

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04778124 (Safety and Effectiveness of Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation Using the HAL-RAR Technique for Hemorrhoidal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04778124 nacompletednot on this map

Safety and Effectiveness of Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation Using the HAL-RAR Technique for Hemorrhoidal Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmalia Fleming General HospitalRan2010 to 2019Enrolled105ConditionsHemorrhoidal DiseaseArmsHemorrhoidal Arterial Ligation (HAL) and Recto Anal Repair (RAR), Excision of thrombosed hemorrhoid / Hemorrhoidectomy /
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sameh Hany EmileDepartment of General surgery, colorectal surgery unit, Mansoura Faculty of medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt. sameh200@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7854-5244
Hossam ElfekiDepartment of General surgery, colorectal surgery unit, Mansoura Faculty of medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmad SakrDepartment of General surgery, colorectal surgery unit, Mansoura Faculty of medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mostafa ShalabyDepartment of General surgery, colorectal surgery unit, Mansoura Faculty of medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKMansoura University · EGMansoura University Hospital · EGYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough conventional hemorrhoidectomy proved effective in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, postoperative pain remains a vexing problem. Alternatives to conventional hemorrhoidectomy as transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) and stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) were described. The present meta-analysis aimed to review the randomized trials that compared THD and SH to determine which technique is superior in terms of recurrence of hemorrhoids, complications, and postoperative pain.

methodsElectronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared THD and SH for internal hemorrhoids. The PRISMA guidelines were followed when reporting this meta-analysis. The primary endpoint of the analysis was persistence or recurrence of hemorrhoidal disease. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain, complications, readmission, return to work, and patients' satisfaction.

resultsSix randomized trials including 554 patients (THD = 280; SH = 274) were included. The mean postoperative pain score of THD was significantly lower than SH (2.9 ± 1.5 versus 3.3 ± 1.6). 13.2% of patients experienced persistent or recurrent hemorrhoids after THD versus 6.9% after SH (OR = 1.93, 95%CI = 1.07-3.51, p = 0.029). Complications were recorded in 17.1% of patients who underwent THD and 23.3% of patients who underwent SH (OR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.43-1.05, p = 0.08). The average duration to return to work after THD was 7.3 ± 5.2 versus 7.7 ± 4.8 days after SH (p = 0.34). Grade IV hemorrhoids was significantly associated with persistence or recurrence of hemorrhoidal disease after both procedures.

conclusionTHD had significantly higher persistence/recurrence rate compared to SH whereas complication and readmission rates, hospital stay, return to work, and patients' satisfaction were similar in both groups.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidectomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical StaplingAnal CanalFemaleHemorrhoidsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainPublication BiasRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeHemorrhoidsMeta-analysisRandomized clinical trialsStapled hemorrhoidopexyTransanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization

Identifiers

PMID30421308
OpenAlexW2901234166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.