Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30421080›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2019

Novel real-time optical imaging modalities for the detection of neoplastic lesions in urology: a systematic review.

Oliver Brunckhorst, Qi Jia Ong, Daniel Elson, Erik Mayer

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver BrunckhorstDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary' Hospital Campus, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK. oliver.brunckhorst10@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2073-922X
Qi Jia OngDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary' Hospital Campus, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Daniel ElsonHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Erik MayerDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary' Hospital Campus, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Imperial College London · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent optical diagnostic techniques for malignancies are limited in their diagnostic accuracy and lack the ability to further characterise disease, leading to the rapidly increasing development of novel imaging methods within urology. This systematic review critically appraises the literature for novel imagining modalities, in the detection and staging of urological cancer and assesses their effectiveness via their utility and accuracy.

methodsA systematic literature search utilising MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library Database was conducted from 1970 to September 2018 by two independent reviewers. Studies were included if they assessed real-time imaging modalities not already approved in guidelines, in vivo and in humans. Outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy and utility parameters, including feasibility and cost.

resultsOf 5475 articles identified from screening, a final 46 were included. Imaging modalities for bladder cancer included optical coherence tomography (OCT), confocal laser endomicroscopy, autofluorescence and spectroscopic techniques. OCT was the most widely investigated, with 12 studies demonstrating improvements in overall diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 74.5-100% and specificity 60-98.5%). Upper urinary tract malignancy diagnosis was assessed using photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), narrow band imaging, optical coherence tomography and confocal laser endomicroscopy. Only PDD demonstrated consistent improvements in overall diagnostic accuracy in five trials (sensitivity 94-96% and specificity 96.6-100%). Limited evidence for optical coherence tomography in percutaneous renal biopsy was identified, with anecdotal evidence for any modality in penile cancer.

conclusionsEvidence supporting the efficacy for identified novel imaging modalities remains limited at present. However, OCT for bladder cancer and PDD in upper tract malignancy demonstrate the best potential for improvement in overall diagnostic accuracy. OCT may additionally aid intraoperative decision making via real-time staging of disease. Both modalities require ongoing investigation through larger, well-conducted clinical trials to assess their diagnostic accuracy, use as an intraoperative staging aid and how to best utilise them within clinical practice.

Indexed as

Optical ImagingHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalNarrow Band ImagingSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrum AnalysisTomography, Optical CoherenceUrologic NeoplasmsDiagnostic imagingNeoplasmOptical imagingUrological malignancy

Identifiers

PMID30421080
PMCPMC6484817
OpenAlexW2900538612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.