Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30421077›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2019

A Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) statement on closed social media (Facebook®) groups for clinical education and consultation: issues of informed consent, patient privacy, and surgeon protection.

James G Bittner, Heather J Logghe, Erica D Kane, Ross F Goldberg, Adnan Alseidi, Rajesh Aggarwal, Brian P Jacob

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James G BittnerDepartment of Surgery, St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Heather J LoggheDepartment of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Erica D KaneDepartment of Anesthesia, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ross F GoldbergDepartment of Surgery, Maricopa Integrated Health System, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Adnan AlseidiDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rajesh AggarwalDepartment of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brian P JacobLaparoscopic Surgical Center of New York, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. bpjacob@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClosed social media groups (CSMG), including closed Facebook® groups, are online communities providing physicians with platforms to collaborate privately via text, images, videos, and live streaming in real time and optimize patient care. CSMG platforms represent a novel paradigm in online learning and education, so it is imperative to ensure that the public and patients trust the physicians using these platforms. Informed consent is an essential aspect of establishing this trust. With the launch of several of its own CSMG, Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) sought to define its position on CSMG platforms and provide an informed consent template for educating and protecting patients, surgeons, and institutions.

methodsA review of the literature (2012-2018) discussing the informed consent process for posting clinical scenarios, photography, and/or videography on social media was performed. Pertinent articles and exemplary legal counsel-approved CSMG policies and informed consent forms were reviewed by members of the SAGES Facebook® Task Force.

resultsEleven articles and two institutional CSMG policies discussing key components of the informed consent process, including patient transparency and confidentiality, provider-patient partnerships, ethics, and education were included. Using this information and expert opinion, a SAGES-approved statement and informed consent template were formulated.

conclusionsSAGES endorses the professional use of medical and surgical CSMG platforms for education, patient care optimization, and dissemination of clinical information. Despite the growing use of social media as an integral tool for surgical practice and education, issues of informed consent still exist and remain the responsibility of the physician contributor. Responsible, ethical, and compliant use of CSMG platforms is essential. Surgeons and patients embracing CSMG for quality improvement and optimized outcomes should be legally protected. SAGES foresees the use of this type of platform continuing to grow.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentPrivacySocial MediaSocieties, MedicalConfidentialityDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEducation, Medical, ContinuingEndoscopyHumansReferral and ConsultationSurgeonsClosed groupsEducationFacebookInformed consentSocial mediaSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.