Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30421031›Full record

ReviewJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes2019

Forever young: Neoteny, neurogenesis and a critique of critical periods in olfaction.

David M Coppola, Leonard E White

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M CoppolaDepartment of Biology, Randolph Macon College, Ashland, VA, 23005, USA. dcoppola@rmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4402-1607
Leonard E WhiteDepartment of Neurology, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Duke University · USRandolph–Macon College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The critical period concept has been one of the most transcendent in science, education, and society forming the basis of our fixation on 'quality' of childhood experiences. The neural basis of this process has been revealed in developmental studies of visual, auditory and somatosensory maps and their enduring modification through manipulations of experience early in life. Olfaction, too, possesses a number of phenomena that share key characteristics with classical critical periods like sensitive temporal windows and experience dependence. In this review, we analyze the candidate critical period-like phenomena in olfaction and find them disanalogous to classical critical periods in other sensory systems in several important ways. This leads us to speculate as to why olfaction may be alone among exteroceptive systems in lacking classical critical periods and how life-long neurogenesis of olfactory sensory neurons and bulbar interneurons-a neotenic vestige-- relates to the structure and function of the mammalian olfactory system.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisAnimalsHumansInterneuronsOlfactory BulbOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSmellGranule cellsImprintingOlfactory-sensory-neuronsRostral-migratory-stream

Identifiers

PMID30421031
OpenAlexW2900867766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.