Trial reportEuropean radiology2019
Validation of overestimation ratio and TL-SVS as imaging biomarker of cardioembolic stroke and time from onset to MRI.
Trial report in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negative susceptibility vessel sign might be predictive of complete reperfusion in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion managed with thrombectomy.European radiology · 2023Article
- Imaging diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerosis stenosis-related large vessel occlusion before and during endovascular therapy.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to determine in the "THRACE" trial, the clinical and MRI technical parameters associated with the two-layered susceptibility vessel sign (TL-SVS) and the overestimation ratio (overR). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with pre-treatment brain gradient echo (GRE) sequence and an etiological work-up were identified. Two readers reviewed TL-SVS, i.e., a SVS with a linear low-intense signal core surrounded by a higher intensity and measured the overR as the width of SVS divided by the width of the artery. Binomial and ordinal logistic regression respectively tested the association between TL-SVS and quartiles of overR with patient characteristics, cardioembolic stroke (CES), time from onset to imaging, and GRE sequence parameters (inter slice gap, slice thickness, echo time, flip angle, voxel size, and field strength).
resultsAmong 258 included patients, 102 patients were examined by 3 Tesla MRI and 156 by 1.5 Tesla MRI. Intra- and inter-reader agreements for quartiles of overR and TL-SVS were good to excellent. The median overR was 1.59 (IQR, 1.30 to 1.86). TL-SVS was present in 101 patients (39.2%, 95%CI, 33.1 to 45.1%). In multivariate analysis, only CES was associated with overR quartiles (OR, 1.83; 95%CI, 1.11 to 2.99), and every 60 min increase from onset to MRI time was associated with TL-SVS (OR, 1.72; 95%CI, 1.10 to 2.67). MRI technical parameters were statistically associated with neither overR nor TL-SVS.
conclusionIndependent of GRE sequence parameters, an increased overR was associated to CES, while the TL-SVS is independently related to a longer time from onset to MRI. KEY POINTS: • An imaging biomarker would be useful to predict the etiology of stroke in order to adapt secondary prevention of stroke. • The two-layered susceptibility vessel sign and the overestimation ratio are paramagnetic effect derived markers that vary according to the MRI machines and sequence parameters. • Independent of sequence parameters, an increased overestimation ratio was associated to cardioembolic stroke, while the two-layered susceptibility vessel sign is independently related to a longer time from onset to MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30421018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.