Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30421012›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Swallowing MRI-a reliable method for the evaluation of the postoperative gastroesophageal situs after Nissen fundoplication.

Michael A Arnoldner, Ivan Kristo, Matthias Paireder, Enrico P Cosentini, Wolfgang Schima, Michael Weber, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Variability in endoscopic assessment of Nissen fundoplication wrap integrity and hiatus herniation.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. New frontiers in esophageal radiology.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A ArnoldnerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ivan KristoDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PairederDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Enrico P CosentiniDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang SchimaDepartment of Radiology, Göttlicher Heiland Krankenhaus, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, and Sankt Josef Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria.
Michael WeberDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sebastian F SchoppmannDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christiane Kulinna-CosentiniDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Christiane.Kulinna-Cosentini@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1398
Medical University of Vienna · ATBarmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of swallowing MRI of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) in the postoperative care of patients after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 79 symptomatic patients (mean age, 52.3 years; range, 26-80 years) were evaluated after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. MRI findings were correlated with revision surgery, endoscopy, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) as standard of reference. MRI was performed on a 3.0-T unit using T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequences for anatomical assessment of the GEJ followed by dynamic MR swallowing (fast low-angle shot sequences). Four independent readers (two radiologists, two surgeons) rated 83 MR scans according to defined criteria, such as wrap disruption, slipping, recurrent hiatal hernia, and esophageal motility disorder.

resultsWrap disruption was correctly diagnosed concordantly with the standard of reference in 87.8%, slipping in 81.5%, and recurrent hiatal hernia in 84.9% of the cases. For esophageal motility disorder, MRI interpretation was consistent with manometry in 66.2% of the subjects. Interobserver analysis showed substantial agreement for recurrent hiatal hernia (k = 0.703), moderate agreement for wrap disruption (k = 0.585), and fair agreement for motility disorder and slipping (k = 0.234 and k = 0.200, respectively).

conclusionMR swallowing readily depicts the major failure mechanisms of LARS and has good reliability even in non-experienced readers. KEY POINTS: • MR swallowing accurately readily depicts the major failure mechanisms of laparoscopic antireflux surgery and has good reliability even in non-experienced readers. • It should be included in the preoperative workup for revision surgery after fundoplication. • It will be of great benefit to surgeons in considering and planning a reoperation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDeglutitionEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxHernia, HiatalHumansLaparoscopyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleManometryMiddle AgedFundoplicationGERDMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID30421012
PMCPMC6610269
OpenAlexW2900464691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.